Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,69301) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TONCHEV v. BULGARIA
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 18527/02
- EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
Factors such as the nature and context of the treatment, the manner and method of its execution, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim must all be taken into account (see, among many other authorities, Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C). - EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96
CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
However, since the applicant brought a civil claim against M.T. from the very outset, Article 6 § 1 applied, under its civil limb, to the entirety of the proceedings (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 62, ECHR 2002-I, and Perez, cited above, §§ 70 and 71). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII, and P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), 56547/00, 11 December 2001).
- EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 56547/00
P., C. ET S. c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95
ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
There are therefore no grounds for making an award in respect of these matters (see, mutatis mutandis, Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 167, 16 July 2002, and Türkoÿlu v. Turkey, no. 34506/97, § 138, 17 March 2005). - EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 72663/01
NIKOLAY DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
Previous cases in which the Court has found that the State's positive obligations under Article 3 were engaged concerned far more serious instances of ill-treatment: beating with a garden cane applied with considerable force on more than one occasion (see A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 21, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI), very serious neglect and abuse for a number of years (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 11-36, 40 and 74, ECHR 2001-V), consistent sexual abuse over a period of years (see D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719/97, §§ 66-74, 10 October 2002), extremely serious sexual and physical abuse over a long period of time (see E. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 33218/96, §§ 43 and 89, 26 November 2002), multiple rape (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 16-21, 30 and 153, ECHR 2003-XII), beating all over the body with wooden planks, leading to multiple rib fractures (see Secic v. Croatia, no. 40116/02, § 8, 11 and 51, ECHR 2007-VI), and anal fissure caused by several attackers in highly intimidating circumstances (see Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 9 and 70, 27 September 2007). - EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97
TÜRKOGLU v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
There are therefore no grounds for making an award in respect of these matters (see, mutatis mutandis, Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 167, 16 July 2002, and Türkoÿlu v. Turkey, no. 34506/97, § 138, 17 March 2005). - EGMR, 31.08.2004 - 34407/02
C. and D. and S. and OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
A restrictive or technical approach in this area is therefore to be avoided and the key consideration in such cases is that any serious issues concerning respect for a child's rights should be examined (see C. and D. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34407/02, 31 August 2004, citing Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 72001/01, 23057/03, 18527/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Dezember 2013 - 72001/01, 23057/03, 18527/02 (https://dejure.org/2013,64462)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,64462) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ATANASOVA ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ATANASOVA AND 2 OTHER CASES AGAINST BULGARIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 72001/01
- EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 72001/01, 23057/03, 18527/02
Wird zitiert von ... (3)
- EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04
RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA
The Court observes at the outset that Article 6 does not give rise to a right to have criminal proceedings instituted in a particular case or to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence (see, for example, Rampogna and Murgia v. Italy (dec.), no. 40753/98, 11 May 1999; Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I; and Dinchev v. Bulgaria, no. 23057/03, § 39, 22 January 2009). - EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 24340/07
PETRELLA c. ITALIE
La Cour estime que le grief concernant le défaut d'accès au tribunal pose une question distincte par rapport à celle de la durée de la procédure et par conséquent, conformément à l'approche suivie dans les arrêts Atanasova c. Bulgarie (no 72001/01, §§ 47 et 57, 2 octobre 2008) et Tonchev c. Bulgarie (no 18527/02, §§ 49 et 53, 19 novembre 2009), elle va l'examiner séparément.Tonchev 30. After a few months, the judgment in Atanasova having become final in the meantime, in Tonchev v. Bulgaria (no. 18527/02, §§ 49 and 53, 19 November 2009) the Court for the second time found simultaneous violations.
- EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 40620/14
GROSSU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Cependant, la privation alléguée de liberté n'a duré qu'une dizaine de minutes et le requérant n'a pas prouvé l'existence d'effets psychologiques sévères ou de longue durée (comparer avec Tonchev c. Bulgarie, no 18527/02, §§ 39-40, 19 novembre 2009, et Ilieva et Georgieva c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 9548/07, §§ 29-30, 17 avril 2012).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 18527/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,66091) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TONCHEV v. BULGARIA (II)
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 18527/02
- EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 25.10.2017 - 57045/00
ZHECHEV CONTRE LA BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 18527/02
The Court observes that the applicant did not specify, either in his initial application or in his observations in reply to those of the respondent Government, in what respect Article 13 had, in his view, been breached (see Jechev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 57045/00, 2 May 2006).