Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BURKE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 19807/06

  Article 8 covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, § 22); choices about one's own body in the context of medical treatment and how, in extreme cases, one manages one's death, also fall in principle within its scope (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61-67, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 19807/06

  Positive obligations also arise under Article 3 requiring States to take measures designed to ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are not subjected to torture or inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment (see A. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, § 22; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 29392/95, ECHR 2001-V).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 19807/06

  Article 2 § 1, in its first sentence, enjoins the State not only to refrain from the intentional and unlawful taking of life, but also to take appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction Those principles apply not only to criminal law enforcement but also in the public-health sphere too and impose positive obligations on the State to make regulations compelling hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of their patients" lives (Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, §§ 48-49, ECHR 2002-I).
• EGMR, 09.03.2004 - 61827/00

  GLASS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 19807/06

  The Court is satisfied that the presumption of domestic law is strongly in favour of prolonging life where possible, which accords with the spirit of the Convention (see also its findings as to the compatibility of domestic law with Article 2 in Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 75, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 03.10.2000 - 28369/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 19807/06

  Moreover, the Contracting States enjoy a margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment (see Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no. 28369/95, § 37, ECHR 2000-X).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen