Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 03.03.2015

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02, 9190/03, 39806/05, 10614/06, 36125/14, 7481/06, 32896/07, 37829/08, 24163/11, 60179/09, 29732/07, 32844/07, 15868/07, 30649/05, 8721/05, 7101/06, 53487/99, 61050/11, 50054/07, 33200/11, 38055/06, 35207/03, 21061/11, 51216/06, 39584/07, 28173/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,6457
EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02, 9190/03, 39806/05, 10614/06, 36125/14, 7481/06, 32896/07, 37829/08, 24163/11, 60179/09, 29732/07, 32844/07, 15868/07, 30649/05, 8721/05, 7101/06, 53487/99, 61050/11, 50054/07, 33200/11, 38055/06, 35207/03, 21061/11, 51216/06, 39584/07, 28173/10 (https://dejure.org/2018,6457)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.03.2018 - 12066/02, 9190/03, 39806/05, 10614/06, 36125/14, 7481/06, 32896/07, 37829/08, 24163/11, 60179/09, 29732/07, 32844/07, 15868/07, 30649/05, 8721/05, 7101/06, 53487/99, 61050/11, 50054/07, 33200/11, 38055/06, 35207/03, 21061/11, 51216/06, 39584/07, 28173/10 (https://dejure.org/2018,6457)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. März 2018 - 12066/02, 9190/03, 39806/05, 10614/06, 36125/14, 7481/06, 32896/07, 37829/08, 24163/11, 60179/09, 29732/07, 32844/07, 15868/07, 30649/05, 8721/05, 7101/06, 53487/99, 61050/11, 50054/07, 33200/11, 38055/06, 35207/03, 21061/11, 51216/06, 39584/07, 28173/10 (https://dejure.org/2018,6457)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,6457) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CIORAP CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET 26 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CIORAP AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 26 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 12066/02
  • EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 12066/02
  • EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02, 9190/03, 39806/05, 10614/06, 36125/14, 7481/06, 32896/07, 37829/08, 24163/11, 60179/09, 29732/07, 32844/07, 15868/07, 30649/05, 8721/05, 7101/06, 53487/99, 61050/11, 50054/07, 33200/11, 38055/06, 35207/03, 21061/11, 51216/06, 39584/07, 28173/10
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Zitiert selbst (31)

  • EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 289/04

    POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA

    The Court recalls that the general principles concerning conditions of detention have been set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005).

    The Court recalls that in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, § 112, 13 September 2005), it found a violation of Article 13 on the ground that there were no effective remedies against the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Moldova.

  • EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

    SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

    Consequently, the Court is not satisfied that the remedy under Law No. 1545 would have been effective in connection with the applicant's complaints (see, Ostrovar v. Moldova, 35207/03, (dec.), 22 March 2005).
  • EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 6289/03

    IRINEL POPA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    Par ailleurs, dans la mesure où les tribunaux n'ont avancé aucun élément pour appuyer l'hypothèse du risque d'entrave de l'enquête, la Cour ne saurait accepter que le simple fait que des preuves - notamment à décharge - soient encore à administrer suffise pour justifier, au regard de l'article précité, le maintien d'une personne en détention provisoire (paragraphe 15 ci-dessus ; Becciev c. Moldova, no 9190/03, § 59, 4 octobre 2005).
  • EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 15868/07

    [ENG]

    The Court reiterates that the general principles concerning conditions of detention have been set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 7101/06

    MALAI v. MOLDOVA

    The Court recalls that the general principles concerning conditions of detention have been set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005).
  • EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 61050/11

    MESCEREACOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    The Court reiterates the general principles concerning conditions of detention set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76 79, 13 September 2005).
  • EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11

    PISAROGLU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    The Court reiterates the general principles concerning conditions of detention set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 3584/02

    TARAU c. ROUMANIE

    De surcroît, tout en maintenant la détention en vertu de l'article 148 h), ils ont invoqué plusieurs motifs d'un autre ordre, sans présenter aucune preuve factuelle quant aux risques allégués (Becciev c. Moldova, no 9190/03, § 59, 4 octobre 2005): le risque de récidive, même si l'intéressé n'avait pas d'antécédents pénaux, et celui d'entrave au bon déroulement de l'instruction (paragraphes §§ 11 in fine et 16 ci-dessus).
  • EGMR, 22.05.2025 - 50704/21

    VEEN v. SLOVAKIA and 2 other applications

    Rn. 19 The Court finds that the above-mentioned grounds cannot be regarded as abstract, stereotyped or without any application to the applicant's case (contrast, for example, Becciev v. Moldova, no. 9190/03, § 62, 4 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 25842/03

    NICUT-TANASESCU c. ROUMANIE

    En ce qui concerne les demandes liées aux droits salariaux, le Gouvernement, citant la jurisprudence de la Cour (Kalachnikov c. Russie, no 47095/99, § 139, CEDH 2002-VI, et Becciev c. Moldova, no 9190/03, § 81, 4 octobre 2005) souligne que le requérant n'a pas réussi à démontrer la réalité des pertes alléguées.
  • EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 48072/19

    BUL c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 23204/07

    GHAVTADZE c. GEORGIE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,3046
EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,3046)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.03.2015 - 21061/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,3046)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. März 2015 - 21061/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,3046)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,3046) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 30649/05

    HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    The Court reiterates that it has examined on numerous occasions the issue of domestic remedies in respect of poor conditions of detention in Moldova (see Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, §§ 101-107, 7 November 2006; Istratii and Others v. Moldova, nos.
  • EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 14437/05

    MODARCA v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05, § 38, 27 March 2007; Modarca v. Moldova, no. 14437/05, § 47, 10 May 2007; and Stepuleac v. Moldova, no. 8207/06, § 46, 6 November 2007), and has concluded on each occasion that the remedies suggested by the Government were ineffective in respect of individuals currently held in detention because they did not offer a possibility of putting an end to their detention in inhuman and degrading conditions.
  • EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02

    CIORAP CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET 26 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    The Court reiterates the general principles concerning conditions of detention set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005).
  • EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 8207/06

    STEPULEAC v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05, § 38, 27 March 2007; Modarca v. Moldova, no. 14437/05, § 47, 10 May 2007; and Stepuleac v. Moldova, no. 8207/06, § 46, 6 November 2007), and has concluded on each occasion that the remedies suggested by the Government were ineffective in respect of individuals currently held in detention because they did not offer a possibility of putting an end to their detention in inhuman and degrading conditions.
  • EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 7101/06

    MALAI v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    In Malai v. Moldova (no. 7101/06, §§ 42-46, 13 November 2008), it found that "it has not been shown that effective remedies existed in respect of the applicant's complaint under Article 3" concerning conditions of detention.
  • EGMR, 27.03.2007 - 8721/05

    ISTRATII v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05, § 38, 27 March 2007; Modarca v. Moldova, no. 14437/05, § 47, 10 May 2007; and Stepuleac v. Moldova, no. 8207/06, § 46, 6 November 2007), and has concluded on each occasion that the remedies suggested by the Government were ineffective in respect of individuals currently held in detention because they did not offer a possibility of putting an end to their detention in inhuman and degrading conditions.
  • EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11
    In such circumstances, the Court considers that there are no reasons to depart from the conclusions reached in Hadji v. Moldova (nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012).
  • EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02

    CIORAP CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET 26 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    21061/11.
  • EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 72238/14

    COTEÈš v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    The Court recalls that it has found the conditions of detention in Prison no. 13 to be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention in a number of cases examined by it (see, amongst many other authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
  • EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 61050/11

    MESCEREACOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    In such circumstances, the Court considers that there are no reasons to depart from the conclusions reached in its previous judgments (see among recent authorities Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
  • EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 17963/08

    [ENG]

    In such circumstances, the Court considers that there are no reasons to depart from the conclusions reached in its previous judgments (see among recent authorities Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
  • EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 20546/16

    SECRIERU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    The Court recalls that it has found the conditions of detention in Prison no. 13 to be contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in numerous judgments (see, amongst many other authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
  • EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14

    BOTNARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    In the absence of any evidence from the Government that considerable improvements in Prison no. 13 had taken place in recent years, the Court considers that there is no reason to depart from the conclusions reached in its previous judgments (see, among recent authorities, Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, § 18, 3 March 2015; Cristioglo v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 24163/11, § 23, 26 April 2016, and Valentin Baştovoi, cited above, § 25).
  • EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 30921/10

    GOREMICHIN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    In so far as the conditions of detention in Prison no. 13 are concerned, the Court recalls that it has found them to be contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in numerous judgments (see, among recent authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 40614/14

    VALENTIN BASTOVOI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

    Dans ces conditions, la Cour ne voit aucune raison de s'éloigner des constats opérés dans ses jugements précédents à l'égard de cette prison (voir, entre autres, Hadji c. Moldova, nos 32844/07 et 41378/07, § 20, 14 février 2012, Silvestru c. République de Moldova, no 28173/10, § 21, 13 janvier 2015, et Pisaroglu c. République de Moldova, no 21061/11, § 18, 3 mars 2015).
  • EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 36125/14

    BASTOVOI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    In the absence of any evidence from the Government that considerable improvements in Prison no. 13 had taken place during recent years, the Court considers that there is no reason to depart from the conclusions reached in its previous judgments (see, among recent authorities, Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015; and Mescereacov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 61050/11, 16 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 74497/13

    MIRON v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    The Court recalls that it has found the conditions of detention in prison no. 13 to be contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in numerous judgments (see, among recent authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; and Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht