Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  W.R. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
• EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95

  Rn. 28 Further, the Court recalls that it has constantly held that disciplinary proceedings in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to "contestations" (disputes) over civil rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (Philis v. Greece (no. 2) judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1085, § 45, with references to the following judgments: König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp.
• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95

  29-32, §§ 87-95; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp.
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95

  14-16, §§ 25-29; Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, p. 13, § 27).
• EGMR, 30.11.1987 - 8950/80

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95

  Rn. 27 The Court finds that the applicant's right to practice as a lawyer is a "civil right" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (De Moor v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 16, § 47, with reference to the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 32-34, §§ 44-48).
• EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 16997/90

  DE MOOR c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95

  Rn. 27 The Court finds that the applicant's right to practice as a lawyer is a "civil right" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (De Moor v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 16, § 47, with reference to the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 32-34, §§ 44-48).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 05.04.2016 - 33060/10

  Vertretungsverbot gegen einen Anwalt ohne vorherige Durchführung einer mündlichen …

  Nonetheless, the Court has consistently held that disciplinary proceedings, in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to "contestations" (disputes) over civil rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, §§ 87-95, Series A no. 27; W.R. v. Austria, no. 26602/95, §§ 25-31, 21 December 1999; Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 39, 12 June 2003; and Goriany v. Austria, no. 31356/04, § 21, 10 December 2009).
• EGMR, 09.01.2024 - 56064/16

  AKTAY v. TURKEY and 2 applications

  Rn. 40 The Court notes that the right to practise as a lawyer is a "civil right" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, W.R. v. Austria, no. 26602/95, § 27, 21 December 1999, and Angerjärv and Greinoman, cited above, § 97).
• EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 54711/00

  TROPKINS contre la LETTONIE

  Eu égard à sa jurisprudence constante, la Cour estime que la procédure litigieuse, ayant pour objet le droit du requérant de continuer à pratiquer la profession d'avocat, a donné lieu à une « contestation sur ses droits de caractère civil'au sens de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention (cf., par exemple, W.R. c. Autriche, n° 26602/95, 21.12.1999, §§ 27-28, et arrêt De Moor c. Belgique du 23 juin 1994, série A, n° 292-A, p. 16, § 47).