Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,8163
EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19 (https://dejure.org/2022,8163)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.03.2022 - 26781/19 (https://dejure.org/2022,8163)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. März 2022 - 26781/19 (https://dejure.org/2022,8163)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,8163) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 76136/12

    RAMADAN v. MALTA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    The deprivation of his Danish nationality complained of was thus to a large extent a result of the applicant's own choices and actions (see, inter alia, Ramadan v. Malta, no. 76136/12, § 89, 21 June 2016).
  • EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40601/05

    Rechtssache M. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Thus, the Danish courts took into account, among other things, that the applicant was born in Denmark and had been sentenced to five years' imprisonment for serious offences committed as an adult (see, also for example, Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, 23 October 2018, Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, 10 April 2012, and Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, 25 March 2010).
  • EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14

    NDIDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    "Very serious reasons" were adequately adduced by the national authorities when assessing his case, and the expulsion order cannot be said to be disproportionate to the legitimate aim pursued, namely, the protection of the public from the threat of terrorism (see, inter alia, K2 v. United Kingdom, cited above, § 66, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark, cited above, § 84; see also, among many others, Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215/14, § 76, 14 September 2017, and Levakovic v. Denmark, cited above, § 45).
  • EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52273/16

    GHOUMID c. FRANCE et 4 autres affaires

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Deprivation of citizenship 15. The Court notes that the general principles applicable to cases involving deprivation of nationality are well-established in the Court's case-law (see, for example K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, §§ 49-50, 7 February 2017, Mansour Said Abdul Salam Mubarak v. Denmark (dec.), no. 74411/16, §§ 62-63, 22 January 2019, Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16, §§ 43-44, 25 June 2020, Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 52-54, 22 December 2020, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), cited above, §§ 44-45 and 52-55).
  • EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 7841/14

    LEVAKOVIC v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Thus, the Danish courts took into account, among other things, that the applicant was born in Denmark and had been sentenced to five years' imprisonment for serious offences committed as an adult (see, also for example, Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, 23 October 2018, Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, 10 April 2012, and Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, 25 March 2010).
  • EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 42387/13

    K2 v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Deprivation of citizenship 15. The Court notes that the general principles applicable to cases involving deprivation of nationality are well-established in the Court's case-law (see, for example K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, §§ 49-50, 7 February 2017, Mansour Said Abdul Salam Mubarak v. Denmark (dec.), no. 74411/16, §§ 62-63, 22 January 2019, Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16, §§ 43-44, 25 June 2020, Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 52-54, 22 December 2020, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), cited above, §§ 44-45 and 52-55).
  • EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Thus, the Danish courts took into account, among other things, that the applicant was born in Denmark and had been sentenced to five years' imprisonment for serious offences committed as an adult (see, also for example, Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, 23 October 2018, Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, 10 April 2012, and Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, 25 March 2010).
  • EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

    USMANOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Deprivation of citizenship 15. The Court notes that the general principles applicable to cases involving deprivation of nationality are well-established in the Court's case-law (see, for example K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, §§ 49-50, 7 February 2017, Mansour Said Abdul Salam Mubarak v. Denmark (dec.), no. 74411/16, §§ 62-63, 22 January 2019, Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16, §§ 43-44, 25 June 2020, Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 52-54, 22 December 2020, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), cited above, §§ 44-45 and 52-55).
  • EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 74411/16

    SAID ABDUL SALAM MUBARAK v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Deprivation of citizenship 15. The Court notes that the general principles applicable to cases involving deprivation of nationality are well-established in the Court's case-law (see, for example K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, §§ 49-50, 7 February 2017, Mansour Said Abdul Salam Mubarak v. Denmark (dec.), no. 74411/16, §§ 62-63, 22 January 2019, Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16, §§ 43-44, 25 June 2020, Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 52-54, 22 December 2020, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), cited above, §§ 44-45 and 52-55).
  • EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 27801/19

    JOHANSEN v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19
    Relevant domestic law and Council of Europe documents 12. The relevant domestic law and Council of Europe documents were recently set out in Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, §§ 21-28, 1 February 2022.
  • EuGH, 23.04.2026 - C-446/24

    Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts …

    Rn. 43 Diese Auslegung wird durch die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte bestätigt, wonach der Umstand, dass ein Drittstaatsangehöriger eine schwerwiegende Gefahr für die öffentliche Ordnung wie etwa eine terroristische Gefahr darstellt, für sich genommen für die Annahme ausreichen kann, dass die zuständigen nationalen Behörden in Anbetracht einer Prüfung aller relevanten Umstände, die die Situation dieser Person kennzeichnen, berechtigt sind, gegen diesen Drittstaatsangehörigen nicht nur eine Ausweisung aus dem nationalen Hoheitsgebiet, sondern auch ein unbefristetes Einreiseverbot zu verfügen, ohne dass ihnen vorgeworfen werden könnte, damit Art. 8 der am 4. November 1950 in Rom unterzeichneten Europäischen Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten über das Recht auf Achtung des Privat- und Familienlebens verletzt zu haben (vgl. in diesem Sinne EGMR, 25. März 2010, Mutlag/Deutschland, CE:ECHR:2010:0325JUD004060105, §§ 60 bis 63, EGMR, 30. November 2021, Avci/Dänemark, CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD004024019, §§ 35 bis 39, EGMR, 22. März 2022, Laraba/Dänemark, CE:ECHR:2022:0322DEC002678119, §§ 32 bis 35, und EGMR, 5. September 2023, Al-Masudi/Dänemark, CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD003574021, §§ 33 bis 36).
  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 02.10.2025 - C-446/24

    Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Einwanderungspolitik - Richtlinie 2008/115/EG - …

    {FN:43} Vgl. Entscheidungen des EGMR vom 7. Februar 2017, K2/Vereinigtes Königreich (CE:ECHR:2017:0207DEC004238713, § 66), vom 1. Februar 2022, Johansen/Dänemark (CE:ECHR:2022:0201DEC002780119, §§ 80 bis 84), und vom 22. März 2022, Laraba/Dänemark (CE:ECHR:2022:0322DEC002678119, §§ 31 bis 34).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2024 - 25491/18

    EL AROUD c. BELGIQUE et 1 autre affaire

    Dans certaines affaires, elle a d'abord analysé les allégations relatives au caractère arbitraire de la mesure, puis les conséquences que la mesure avait produites pour la personne concernée (K2 c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 42387/13, 7 février 2017, Ghoumid et autres c. France, nos 52273/16 et 4 autres, 25 juin 2020, Johansen c. Danemark (déc.), no 27801/19, 1er février 2022, et Laraba c. Danemark (déc.), no 26781/19, 22 mars 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 60766/19

    FATEH v. DENMARK and 1 other application

    Rn. 4 It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 32739/21

    PAYAM v. DENMARK

    Rn. 4 It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 54157/21

    KURLAND v. DENMARK

    Rn. 4 It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 21783/22

    CAKMAK v. DENMARK

    Rn. 4 It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 17.09.2024 - 29295/22

    ABO v. ESTONIA

    Rn. 66 By contrast, in a number of cases relating to the revocation of citizenship in a terrorism-related context, the Court first ascertained whether the impugned measures were arbitrary and then considered the impact of the deprivation of nationality on the applicants' private life (see Ghoumid and Others v. France, nos. 52273/16 and 4 others, § 44, 25 June 2020; see also Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, §§ 16-26, 22 March 2022, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, §§ 46-70, 1 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 61126/19

    BELGACEM v. DENMARK

    Rn. 4 It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 11093/22

    DAVUD KIBAR v. DENMARK

    Rn. 4 It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2023 - 6041/23

    A.A. v. DENMARK

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht