Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NURMINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 26633/95

  BADER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27881/95

  26633/95, Dec.

  above-mentioned No. 26633/95).

• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27881/95

  judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 74, para.
• EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27881/95

  23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 22, para.
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27881/95

  26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p. 29, para.
• EKMR, 03.10.1975 - 7096/75

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27881/95

  to referenda (see No. 7096/75, Dec.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11

  MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY

  23868/94 and 23869/94, Commission decision of 24 February 1995, DR 80, p. 162; Bader v. Austria, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996; Nurminen and Others v. Finland, no. 27881/95, Commission decision of 26 February 1997; and Grupo Interpres SA v. Spain, no. 32849/96, Commission decision of 7 April 1997, DR 89, p. 150) and by the Court, which in paragraph 74 of its 1987 judgment in the Leander case set out the approach which was to become the standard jurisprudential position on the matter in later years:.
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 22962/15

  MOOHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Au contraire, ils ont dit sans équivoque que cet article ne s'appliquait qu'aux élections portant sur le choix du corps législatif et non aux référendums (X. c. Royaume-Uni, décision précitée, Bader c. Autriche (déc.), no 26633/95, décision de la Commission du 15 mai 1996, non publiée, Nurminen et autres c. Finlande (déc.), no 27881/95, 26 février 1997, Castelli et autres c. Italie, nos 35790/97 et 38438/97, décision de la Commission du 14 septembre 1998, DR 94, p. 102, Hilbe c. Liechtenstein (déc.), no 31981/96, CEDH 1999-VI, Borghi c. Italie (déc.), no 54767/00, CEDH 2002-V (extraits), Ž.
• EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 48818/17

  CUMHURIYET HALK PARTISI v. TURKEY

  It follows, as the Court has previously held, that the ordinary meaning of the language used in Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 limits its application to elections concerning the choice of the legislature, held at reasonable intervals, and does not apply to referendums (see X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 7096/75, Commission decision of 3 October 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 3; Bader v. Austria, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996, unreported; Nurminen v. Finland (dec.), no. 27881/95, 26 February 1997; Castelli and Others v. Italy, nos.