Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STYRANOWSKI c. POLOGNE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STYRANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 27.06.1996 - 28616/95
• EKMR, 15.04.1997 - 28616/95
• EGMR, 30.10.1998 - 28616/95

Wird zitiert von ... (23)

• EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 15056/02

  MILOSEVIC v.

  The Court reiterates that in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 10 April 1997 (see, among other authorities, Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53, and Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 13270/02

  DIKA v.

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 44208/02

  ARSOV v.

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).

 
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 38202/02

  LICKOV v.

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see, among other authorities, Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII).
• EGMR, 19.01.2006 - 21322/02

  TSAGGARIS v. CYPRUS

  However, the Court reiterates that, in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 1 January 1989 (see, among other authorities, Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 19.01.2006 - 2647/02

  JOSEPHIDES v. CYPRUS

  However, the Court reiterates that, in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 1 January 1989 (see, among other authorities, Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 28827/02

  ISAYEV v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see, mutatis mutandis, Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 22581/04

  CHEPYZHNA v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 31.01.2008 - 22775/03

  FANDRALYUK v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  NANKOV v.

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; and Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 9616/03

  SVISTUN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 44221/02

  MIHAJLOSKI v.
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 12803/02

  OGURTSOVA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 26124/02

  MZT LEARNICA A.D. v.
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 22928/03

  MARKOSKI v.
• EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 19106/03

  PASTELLIS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 19.01.2006 - 20429/02

  PAPAKOKKINOU v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 15733/02

  CAMASSO v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 41228/02

  RIZOVA v.
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 44353/02

  KOSTOVSKA v.
• EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02

  ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v.
• EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 13898/02

  DUMANOVSKI v.
• EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 18345/03

  LEBEDEVA v. UKRAINE