Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MASLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MASLOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (52)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 43701/18 (anhängig)

  LYAPIN v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Rn. 9 Following the death of the applicant Mr Lyapin (application no. 43701/18) his wife Ms Liliya Viktorovna Lyapina expressed her wish to pursue the applications on behalf of the deceased applicant.

  62807/09 and 43701/18, in respect of whom it finds only a violation of the procedural limb of that provision.

  62807/09, 43701/18, 19125/20, 26735/20 and 3034/22 also submitted complaints under Article 13 of the Convention.

  Declares that Ms Liliya Viktorovna Lyapina has standing to pursue application no. 43701/18 in the stead of the late applicant Mr Lyapin;.

  62807/09 and 43701/18, in respect of whom it finds only a violation of the procedural limb of that provision;.

  43701/18.

• EGMR - 77068/14 (anhängig)

  KARPYUK v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Rn. 3 The Ukrainian Government were invited to intervene as third party in the proceedings in application no. 77068/14.

  Rn. 4 On 16 December 2014 the Court applied interim measure in application no. 77068/14 and gave it priority (under Rules 39 and 41 of the Rules of Court).

  53373/14, 77068/14, 23922/20 and 53881/20 the applicants submitted other complaints which, in the light of the Court's established case-law, also raised issues under the Convention, including a complaint under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the use for conviction of self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture or ill-treatment (see attached table).

  Rn. 22 The applicant in application no. 77068/14 also raised other complaints under various Convention provisions.

  Declares the complaints concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, and the failure to investigate the allegations of the ill-treatment, and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need for a separate examination of the applicants' remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and dismisses the remainder of application no. 77068/14 as inadmissible;.

  77068/14.

• EGMR - 53373/14 (anhängig)

  ZHDAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Rn. 12 The Government submitted unilateral declaration in application no. 53373/14 whereby they acknowledged violations of Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention in respect of the applicant and offered to pay him a sum of money.

  53373/14, 77068/14, 23922/20 and 53881/20 the applicants submitted other complaints which, in the light of the Court's established case-law, also raised issues under the Convention, including a complaint under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the use for conviction of self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture or ill-treatment (see attached table).

  Rejects the Government's request to strike application no. 53373/14 out of its list of cases under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention on the basis of the unilateral declaration which they submitted;.

  53373/14.

• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Rn. 17 Furthermore, in the cases of Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 128-40, 24 July 2014, and Samesov v. Russia, no. 57269/14, §§ 54-63, 20 November 2018, as well as in Kuchta and Mętel v. Poland, no. 76813/16, § 88, 2 September 2021, the Court has already found, in particular, that the authorities' refusal to open a fully-fledged criminal investigation into the credible allegations of ill-treatment, as well as the lack of assessment of the necessity and proportionality of the use of lawful force by the police were indicative of the State's failure to fulfil its procedural obligation under Article 3 of the Convention.

  The present case is a follow-up complaint lodged by the applicant following the first judgment delivered by the Court in his case of Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, 24 July 2014.

  Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 30-41, 24 July 2014.

• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 06.11.2012 - 13/11

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Forensic expert report no. 828/2018 of 13/11/2018 by the Tuapse Forensic Bureau: hematoma around both eyes, brain concussion.

  On 13/11/2018 the applicant's sister and then on 16/04/2019 the applicant complained to the Tuapse district investigative committee/On 10/04/2019 refusal to open a criminal case/ On 16/04/2019 decision to open a criminal case/ Between 16/10/2019 and 01/07/2021 seven decisions to close the investigation for the lack of corpus delicti; each decision was overruled by the investigators' superiors.

• RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05

  Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Expert report no. 13 of 28/05/2021 by the 111th Main Centre of Forensics of the Ministry of Defence on the examination carried out on 20/05/2021: abrasion on the right shoulder measuring 0.5x0.4 cm, bruises on the right knee measuring 2x1.7 cm and on the left shin measuring 2x1 cm; the injuries could have originated between 5 to 9 days prior to the examination in the circumstances described by the applicant.

  On 20/05/2021 complaint to the 314th military investigations department/on 31/05/2021 and 05/07/2021 refusals to open a criminal case as no crime had taken place: the applicant was interviewed and maintained his complaints; the implicated officers were also questioned and they either denied using any physical force (officer I.) or stated that the force had been used due to the applicant's resistance (officers B., S., F. and G.).

• VGH der UEK, 29.03.2005 - 29/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  On 29/01/2009 complaint to the Orenburg town investigative committee/Between 2009 and 2013 eleven refusals to open a criminal case for lack of the elements of a crime in the police officers' actions, each refusal overruled by the investigators' superiors/Last refusal on 09/04/2013.

  After several rounds of proceedings, on 29/01/2021 the Kaluga Garrison Military Court upheld the last refusal to open a criminal case/ that decision was upheld by the Second Western Circuit Military Court on 06/04/2021.

• KAGH, 05.07.2013 - K 24/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  On 17/09/2019 the Basmanniy District Court of Moscow refused to examine the applicant's complaint for the lack of subject matter/ Upheld on appeal by the Moscow City Court on 24/12/2019.

  24/12/2021.

• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 72051/17

  KORNEYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  5 (1) - unlawful detention - 27/07/2019 at around 9.00 p.m. - 28/07/2019 at 01.20 a.m.; Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrested on 03/08/2019 at 5.00 p.m. and detained until 04/08/2019 at 2.00 a.m.; Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  Then on 27/08/2019 complaint to the Moscow police/ on 28/08/2019 the complaint transferred to the Investigative Committee; on 10/09/2019 the complaint retuned to the police/ No further information given to the applicant, no inquiry opened into the matter.

  On 09/10/2019 the Presnenskiy District Court again refused to examine the applicant's complaint (contesting the transfer of his complaints of 10/09/2019 and inaction of the investigation) for the lack of subject matter/ Upheld on appeal by the Moscow City Court on 16/12/2019.

• EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 50271/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 52783/08

  PETROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 839/02

  MASLOVA AND NALBANDOV c. RUSSIE
• KAGH, 27.04.2012 - M 12/11

  Änderung der Parkordnung eines Parkhauses; Zustimmung der Mitarbeitervertretung
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.06.2012 - 10/12
• VK Rheinland-Pfalz, 27.05.2005 - 15/05

  Nachprüfungsverfahren: Antragsbefugnis trotz fehlender Angebotsabgabe
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 16/04
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14

  ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA
• SG Berlin, 14.09.1955 - 15/12
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA
• VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10

  Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …
• VGH der UEK, 14.11.2005 - 13/04
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08

  TSVETKOVA v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 7077/06

  FORTALNOV v. RUSSIA
• VK Baden-Württemberg, 04.05.2011 - 1 VK 15/11

  Der verantwortliche Entscheidungsträger muss sich ermitteln lassen!
• LG Bonn, 25.09.2008 - 27 Qs 5/08

  Rechtmäßigkeit einer Durchsuchung von Geschäftsräumen aufgrund des Verdachts …
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 2653/13

  YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02

  LIGERES v. LATVIA
• KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11

  Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
• KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06

  KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.02.2005 - 12/04
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.07.2007 - 15/04
• KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06
• VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02

  Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 2281/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 5666/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06

  BELUGIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 19421/15

  v.D. v. CROATIA (NO. 2)
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 39708/07

  KONOVALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 60844/11

  DAURBEKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 26679/08

  NEVZLIN v. RUSSIA
• RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03

  Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
• EGMR, 07.05.2020 - 21171/16

  COBZARU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09

  Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte
• EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 65859/01

  SHEYDAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 57269/14

  SAMESOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 76813/16

  KUCHTA AND MĘTEL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 62003/08

  KURSISH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 20958/14

  EGMR zur Lage auf der Krim: Russland begeht schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen

  With respect to Mr Mykola Karpyuk, the Court reiterates that it has already found that his complaints concerning the torture he had been subjected to and the failure to investigate his allegations of ill-treatment disclosed a breach of both the substantive and procedural limbs of Article 3 of the Convention (Maslova and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.62807/09 and 10 others, §§ 15-18, 11 January 2024).