Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TURBYLEV v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (26)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination are generally recognised international standards which lie at the heart of the notion of a fair procedure under Article 6. Their rationale lies, inter alia, in the protection of the accused against improper compulsion by the authorities, thereby contributing to the avoidance of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6. The right not to incriminate oneself, in particular, presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seek to prove their case against the accused without resort to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 100, ECHR 2006-IX).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, this being primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Having regard to the nature and circumstances of the ill-treatment, the Court finds that it amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 87-93, ECHR 2010; Nasakin v. Russia, no. 22735/05, §§ 51-55, 18 July 2013; and Mostipan v. Russia, no. 12042/09, §§ 58-61, 16 October 2014).

 
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 7377/03

  DAYANAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  A systematic restriction of the right of access to legal assistance, on the basis of statutory provisions, is sufficient in itself for a violation of Article 6 to be found (see Salduz, cited above, § 56; and Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, § 33, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04

  NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Early access to a lawyer at the investigation stage of the proceedings serves as a procedural guarantee of the privilege against self-incrimination and a fundamental safeguard against ill-treatment, given the particular vulnerability of the accused at that stage of the proceedings (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 54, ECHR 2008; Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 263, 21 April 2011; and Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 79, 30 May 2013).
• EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 22735/05

  NASAKIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Having regard to the nature and circumstances of the ill-treatment, the Court finds that it amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 87-93, ECHR 2010; Nasakin v. Russia, no. 22735/05, §§ 51-55, 18 July 2013; and Mostipan v. Russia, no. 12042/09, §§ 58-61, 16 October 2014).
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 12042/09

  MOSTIPAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Having regard to the nature and circumstances of the ill-treatment, the Court finds that it amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 87-93, ECHR 2010; Nasakin v. Russia, no. 22735/05, §§ 51-55, 18 July 2013; and Mostipan v. Russia, no. 12042/09, §§ 58-61, 16 October 2014).

• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 27284/17

  KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017; Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 43, 6 December 2012; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.

  6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - In their decisions the courts relied on the confession statement of 22/04/2014 obtained under duress in the absence of a lawyer (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

  6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - use of confession statement of 13/11/2016 obtained as a result of duress to convict the applicant (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

  6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - the applicant's conviction was based on the self-incriminating statements the applicant had made as a result of his ill-treatment and in the absence of a lawyer (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  MASLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 70, 26 November 2019, Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017, Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos.

  6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - in view of the use of the applicant's self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture for his conviction (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 92-97, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 58772/18

  IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017; Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos.

  6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - use of confession statement of 10/06/2016 obtained as a result of duress (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

 
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA

  RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 67. For the relevant domestic law on the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment and the rights of suspects, see Ryabtsev v. Russia (no. 13642/06, §§ 48-52, 14 November 2013); Lyapin v. Russia (no. 46956/09, §§ 96-102, 24 July 2014); and Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court's assessment 108. The Court reiterates that the admission of confession obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 19498/11

  IDRISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the rights of suspects, see Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; and Belugin v Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06

  KUDAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law on the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment and the rights of suspects, see Ryabtsev v. Russia (no. 13642/06, §§ 48-52, 14 November 2013); Lyapin v. Russia (no. 46956/09, §§ 96-102, 24 July 2014); and Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR, 08.06.2021 - 8372/07

  TSUROYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For relevant domestic law and practice concerning the rights of suspects, see Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010, and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 48053/06

  USPANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the rights of suspects, see Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010, and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 15367/07

  ORAZBAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law on the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment, procedure for examining a criminal complaint and the rights of suspects, see Ryabtsev v. Russia (no. 13642/06, §§ 48-52, 14 November 2013); Lyapin v. Russia (no. 46956/09, §§ 96-102, 24 July 2014); and Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained as a result of torture renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010, and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 3016/16

  BOGDAN v. UKRAINE

  The applicant alleged before the domestic courts that he had been ill-treated, which would throw the validity of the waiver and admissibility of any confession in doubt (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 96, 6 October 2015).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41071/18

  TINGAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 18032/19

  BARONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 30389/19

  GOLOVACHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 15269/13

  RUSISHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  MANSUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13128/06

  URAZBAYEV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 45767/09

  UTVENKO ET BORISOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 52673/07

  GRIGORYEV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 15476/08

  FREDRIKSEN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 63160/13

  AZARSANOV AND BOROKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 39708/07

  ALEKSANDR KONOVALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 17853/09

  PETUKHOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 40452/10 (anhängig)

  BORISOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 49290/06

  MARSHALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 42265/06

  NEUYMIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 38106/05

  YURCHENKOV v. RUSSIA