Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAN VELDEN CONTRE LES PAYS-BAS

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAN VELDEN AGAINST THE NETHERLANDS

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08
• EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 30666/08
• EGMR - 30666/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ...

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09

  DMITRIJEVS v. LATVIA

  It is therefore not necessary to examine the two "safeguard clauses" (see also Giusti v. Italy, no. 13175/03, § 23, 18 October 2011; Van Velden v. the Netherlands, no. 30666/08, §§ 31-37, 19 July 2011).

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAN VELDEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-4 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08
• EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 30666/08
• EGMR - 30666/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08

  The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see, mutatis mutandis, Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 100, Series A no. 161).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08

  As established in Neumeister v. Austria (27 June 1968, p. 37, § 4, Series A no. 8), the second limb of Article 5 § 3 does not give judicial authorities a choice between either bringing an accused to trial within a reasonable time or granting him provisional release pending trial.
• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08

  The Court has clarified its understanding of the new criterion in Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010-..., in the following terms:.

• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04

  LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08

  The position might be otherwise if the deduction from sentence had been based upon an acknowledgement by the national courts of a violation of the Convention (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 41, Series A no. 77, and Pavletic v. Slovakia, no. 39359/98, § 61, 22 June 2004; see also Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 47, 25 October 2007).
• EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08

  The position might be otherwise if the deduction from sentence had been based upon an acknowledgement by the national courts of a violation of the Convention (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 41, Series A no. 77, and Pavletic v. Slovakia, no. 39359/98, § 61, 22 June 2004; see also Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 47, 25 October 2007).
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 39359/98

  PAVLETIC v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30666/08

  The position might be otherwise if the deduction from sentence had been based upon an acknowledgement by the national courts of a violation of the Convention (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 41, Series A no. 77, and Pavletic v. Slovakia, no. 39359/98, § 61, 22 June 2004; see also Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 47, 25 October 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen