Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDULLAH YILDIZ v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94

  Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  Even from a theoretical or philosophical viewpoint, it is legitimate to wonder whether the mere finding of a violation of a fundamental right can possibly afford sufficient redress (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, dissenting opinion of Judge Bonello).
• EGMR, 25.05.2000 - 29870/96

  YAVUZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court does not find that these complaints disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols (as regards the complaint concerning the independence and impartiality of the Supreme Military Administrative Court, see Yavuz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29870/96, 25 May 2000; as for the complaints concerning appeal procedures, chamber assignments and access to classified documents, see KarayiÄŸit (dec.), cited above; as regards the complaint concerning the erroneous and insufficient reasoning in the domestic court's decision, see García Ruiz v. Spain, [GC], no. 30544/96, ECHR 1999-I, and Skorik v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 32671/02, 8 January 2008).
• EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 41718/05

  SCHALLER-BOSSERT c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  Examples of such cases are Schaller-Bossert v. Switzerland (no. 41718/05, § 47, 28 October 2010) and Ellès and Others v. Switzerland (no. 12573/06, §§ 27 and 37, 16 December 2010).

• EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 43980/04

  MIRAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  The Court observes that it dismissed a similar preliminary objection in the case of Miran v. Turkey (no. 43980/04, § 12, 21 April 2009).
• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 12573/06

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  Examples of such cases are Schaller-Bossert v. Switzerland (no. 41718/05, § 47, 28 October 2010) and Ellès and Others v. Switzerland (no. 12573/06, §§ 27 and 37, 16 December 2010).
• EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 21316/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  The Court observes that it has already examined and dismissed similar submissions by the Government in previous cases and found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, amongst others, Miran, cited above, §§ 15-18; Yavuz Selim KarayiÄŸit v. Turkey, no. 45874/05, §§ 11-15, 27 October 2009; and Biçer v. Turkey, no. 21316/05, §§ 14-19, 8 June 2010).
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 32671/02

  SKORIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 35164/05

  In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court does not find that these complaints disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols (as regards the complaint concerning the independence and impartiality of the Supreme Military Administrative Court, see Yavuz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29870/96, 25 May 2000; as for the complaints concerning appeal procedures, chamber assignments and access to classified documents, see KarayiÄŸit (dec.), cited above; as regards the complaint concerning the erroneous and insufficient reasoning in the domestic court's decision, see García Ruiz v. Spain, [GC], no. 30544/96, ECHR 1999-I, and Skorik v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 32671/02, 8 January 2008).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06

  BELUGIN v. RUSSIA

  27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, and in non-Russian cases such as T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644/94, 29 April 1999; Abdullah Yıldız v. Turkey, no. 35164/05, 26 April 2011; Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, 26 April 2016; and, more recently, Oddone and Pecci v. San Marino, nos.
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13128/06

  URAZBAYEV c. RUSSIE

  Et ce problème n'est assurément pas nouveau (voir l'opinion en partie dissidente du juge Bonello dans T.W. c. Malte [GC], no 25644/94, 29 avril 1999, ainsi que l'opinion en partie dissidente du juge Malinverni à laquelle se sont ralliés les juges Popović et Pinto de Albuquerque dans Abdullah Yıldız c. Turquie, no 35164/05, 26 avril 2011, et l'opinion en partie dissidente commune aux juges Spielmann, Sajó, Karakaş et Pinto de Albuquerque dans Murray c. Pays-Bas [GC], no 10511/10, 26 avril 2016).
• EGMR, 10.09.2014 - 8543/05

  DIKEL ET 5 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA TURQUIE

  35164/05.