Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90, 36/1994/483/565 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PALAORO c. AUTRICHE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 57 MRK
Violation de l'art. 6-1 (accès) Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6-1 (publiquement) Dommage - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PALAORO v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 57 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 (access) Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 (publicly) Damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch) - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 10.05.1993 - 16718/90
- EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 16718/90
- EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 16718/90
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90, 36/1994/483/565
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
1 (art. 6-1) of the Convention - as is the case in this instance with the district authority and the regional government (see paragraphs 10, 11 and 12 above) - must be subject to subsequent control by a "judicial body that has full jurisdiction" (see, inter alia and mutatis mutandis, the following judgments: Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para. 29; Öztürk, previously cited, pp. 21-22, para. 56; and Fischer v. Austria of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, para. 28).53; the Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 17, para.
- EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
1 (art. 6-1) of the Convention - as is the case in this instance with the district authority and the regional government (see paragraphs 10, 11 and 12 above) - must be subject to subsequent control by a "judicial body that has full jurisdiction" (see, inter alia and mutatis mutandis, the following judgments: Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para. 29; Öztürk, previously cited, pp. 21-22, para. 56; and Fischer v. Austria of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, para. 28).For the rest, I refer to the methodological objections to this "test" that I raised in paragraph 18 of my separate opinion in the case of Fischer v. Austria (judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312).
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
[6] See, inter alia, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp.
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90
GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564 and 37/1994/484/566. - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
30; see also the Diennet v. France judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, pp. - EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15523/89
SCHMAUTZER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564 and 37/1994/484/566. - EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15527/89
UMLAUFT c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564 and 37/1994/484/566. - EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16713/90
PRAMSTALLER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564 and 37/1994/484/566. - EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16841/90
PFARRMEIER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564 and 37/1994/484/566. - EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16718/90
In order to determine whether an offence qualifies as "criminal" for the purposes of the Convention, it is first necessary to ascertain whether or not the provision (art. 6-1) defining the offence belongs, in the legal system of the respondent State, to criminal law; next the "very nature of the offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty risked must be considered (see, among other authorities, the Öztürk v. Germany judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 18, para. 50, and the Demicoli v. Malta judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 210, pp. 15-17, paras. 31-34). - EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83
HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK
- EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87
DEMICOLI v. MALTA
- EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13308/87
CHORHERR v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90
GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15527/89
UMLAUFT c. AUTRICHE
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16841/90
PFARRMEIER c. AUTRICHE
[3] Affaires nos 31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564 et 36/1994/483/565. - EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15523/89
SCHMAUTZER v. AUSTRIA
[3] Affaires nos 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 35/1994/482/564, 36/1994/483/565 et 37/1994/484/566. - EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 16713/90
PRAMSTALLER v. AUSTRIA
[3] Affaires nos 31/1994/478/560, 32/1994/479/561, 33/1994/480/562, 36/1994/483/565 et 37/1994/484/566.