Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RUMPF ET 70 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'ALLEMAGNE

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RUMPF AND 70 OTHER CASES AGAINST GERMANY

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (25)Neu Zitiert selbst (23)

• BVerfG, 13.08.2012 - 1 BvR 1098/11

  Erfolglose Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen die überlange Dauer eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  By ruling of 13 August 2012 (1 BvR 1098/11), the Federal Constitutional Court rejected as inadmissible a complaint because of the duration of social court proceedings at first instance for lack of a need for legal protection, pointing to the new Legal Redress Act.

  A further non-admission ruling was based on the initial proceedings which had been regarded as too long now having been concluded (order of 13 August 2012 (1 BvR 1098/11)).

• BGH, 20.11.2012 - VIII ZB 49/12

  Zulässigkeit einer Untätigkeitsbeschwerde

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  The rulings of the Federal Courts which have already been handed down since the new law came into force relate to the admissibility of other remedies (Federal Court of Justice, order of 29 November 2012, VIII ZB 49/12), granting legal aid in connection with damage actions (Federal Court of Justice: orders of 20 December 2012; III ZA 33/12; of 8 November 2012, III ZA 27/12; of 25 October 2012 - III ZB 64/12; of 27 June 2012, III ZB 45/12; Federal Finance Court: orders of 12 March 2013, X S 12/13 (PKH)); of 26 July 2012, X S 18/12 (PKH); obligation to have counsel in damage actions (Federal Finance Court, judgment of 6 February 2013, X K 11/12), the impact of the unreasonable length of proceedings in disciplinary proceedings (Federal Administrative Court, orders of 22 January 2013 - 2 B 89.11; of 30 August 2012 - 2 B 21.12; of 1 June 2012, 2 B 123.11; of 16 May 2012 - 2 B 3.12; judgment of 29 March 2012 - Federal Administrative Court 2 A 11.10), as well as the questions concerning the degree to which the excessive length of a set of proceedings can constitute grounds for the admission of an appeal on points of law only (Federal Finance Court, order of 9 January 2013, X B 114/12), and when a delay in proceedings in breach of the rule of law applies in criminal proceedings (Federal Court of Justice, order of 5 December 2012, 1 StR 531/12).
• BVerfG, 28.01.2013 - 2 BvR 1912/12

  Keine verfassungsrechtlichen Bedenken gegen Rspr des BVerwG zur Berücksichtigung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  By rulings of 28 January 2013 (2 BvR 1912/12), 20 June 2012 (2 BvR 1565/11) and 30 May 2012 (1 BvR 2292/11), the Federal Constitutional Court did not admit constitutional complaints because of excessive length of proceedings that had been lodged for adjudication since the applicants had omitted to lodge a damage action in accordance with section 198 subs.

 
• BVerwG, 01.06.2012 - 2 B 123.11

  Zur Bedeutung einer unangemessen langen Dauer des Disziplinarverfahrens

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  The rulings of the Federal Courts which have already been handed down since the new law came into force relate to the admissibility of other remedies (Federal Court of Justice, order of 29 November 2012, VIII ZB 49/12), granting legal aid in connection with damage actions (Federal Court of Justice: orders of 20 December 2012; III ZA 33/12; of 8 November 2012, III ZA 27/12; of 25 October 2012 - III ZB 64/12; of 27 June 2012, III ZB 45/12; Federal Finance Court: orders of 12 March 2013, X S 12/13 (PKH)); of 26 July 2012, X S 18/12 (PKH); obligation to have counsel in damage actions (Federal Finance Court, judgment of 6 February 2013, X K 11/12), the impact of the unreasonable length of proceedings in disciplinary proceedings (Federal Administrative Court, orders of 22 January 2013 - 2 B 89.11; of 30 August 2012 - 2 B 21.12; of 1 June 2012, 2 B 123.11; of 16 May 2012 - 2 B 3.12; judgment of 29 March 2012 - Federal Administrative Court 2 A 11.10), as well as the questions concerning the degree to which the excessive length of a set of proceedings can constitute grounds for the admission of an appeal on points of law only (Federal Finance Court, order of 9 January 2013, X B 114/12), and when a delay in proceedings in breach of the rule of law applies in criminal proceedings (Federal Court of Justice, order of 5 December 2012, 1 StR 531/12).
• BVerfG, 30.05.2012 - 1 BvR 2292/11

  Unzulässigkeit der Rüge einer unangemessenen Verfahrensdauer mangels …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  By rulings of 28 January 2013 (2 BvR 1912/12), 20 June 2012 (2 BvR 1565/11) and 30 May 2012 (1 BvR 2292/11), the Federal Constitutional Court did not admit constitutional complaints because of excessive length of proceedings that had been lodged for adjudication since the applicants had omitted to lodge a damage action in accordance with section 198 subs.
• BGH, 27.06.2012 - III ZB 45/12

  Zurückweisung eines Prozesskostenhilfegesuchs in Entschädigungssachen: …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  The rulings of the Federal Courts which have already been handed down since the new law came into force relate to the admissibility of other remedies (Federal Court of Justice, order of 29 November 2012, VIII ZB 49/12), granting legal aid in connection with damage actions (Federal Court of Justice: orders of 20 December 2012; III ZA 33/12; of 8 November 2012, III ZA 27/12; of 25 October 2012 - III ZB 64/12; of 27 June 2012, III ZB 45/12; Federal Finance Court: orders of 12 March 2013, X S 12/13 (PKH)); of 26 July 2012, X S 18/12 (PKH); obligation to have counsel in damage actions (Federal Finance Court, judgment of 6 February 2013, X K 11/12), the impact of the unreasonable length of proceedings in disciplinary proceedings (Federal Administrative Court, orders of 22 January 2013 - 2 B 89.11; of 30 August 2012 - 2 B 21.12; of 1 June 2012, 2 B 123.11; of 16 May 2012 - 2 B 3.12; judgment of 29 March 2012 - Federal Administrative Court 2 A 11.10), as well as the questions concerning the degree to which the excessive length of a set of proceedings can constitute grounds for the admission of an appeal on points of law only (Federal Finance Court, order of 9 January 2013, X B 114/12), and when a delay in proceedings in breach of the rule of law applies in criminal proceedings (Federal Court of Justice, order of 5 December 2012, 1 StR 531/12).
• BVerfG, 20.06.2012 - 2 BvR 1565/11

  Unzulässigkeit einer Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen Subsidiarität sowie mangels …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  By rulings of 28 January 2013 (2 BvR 1912/12), 20 June 2012 (2 BvR 1565/11) and 30 May 2012 (1 BvR 2292/11), the Federal Constitutional Court did not admit constitutional complaints because of excessive length of proceedings that had been lodged for adjudication since the applicants had omitted to lodge a damage action in accordance with section 198 subs.
• BVerwG, 16.05.2012 - 2 B 3.12

  Unerlaubtes Fernbleiben vom Dienst; Zweck der Disziplinarbefugnis; Verwirkung; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  The rulings of the Federal Courts which have already been handed down since the new law came into force relate to the admissibility of other remedies (Federal Court of Justice, order of 29 November 2012, VIII ZB 49/12), granting legal aid in connection with damage actions (Federal Court of Justice: orders of 20 December 2012; III ZA 33/12; of 8 November 2012, III ZA 27/12; of 25 October 2012 - III ZB 64/12; of 27 June 2012, III ZB 45/12; Federal Finance Court: orders of 12 March 2013, X S 12/13 (PKH)); of 26 July 2012, X S 18/12 (PKH); obligation to have counsel in damage actions (Federal Finance Court, judgment of 6 February 2013, X K 11/12), the impact of the unreasonable length of proceedings in disciplinary proceedings (Federal Administrative Court, orders of 22 January 2013 - 2 B 89.11; of 30 August 2012 - 2 B 21.12; of 1 June 2012, 2 B 123.11; of 16 May 2012 - 2 B 3.12; judgment of 29 March 2012 - Federal Administrative Court 2 A 11.10), as well as the questions concerning the degree to which the excessive length of a set of proceedings can constitute grounds for the admission of an appeal on points of law only (Federal Finance Court, order of 9 January 2013, X B 114/12), and when a delay in proceedings in breach of the rule of law applies in criminal proceedings (Federal Court of Justice, order of 5 December 2012, 1 StR 531/12).
• BFH, 06.02.2013 - X K 11/12

  Vertretungszwang auch bei Entschädigungsklagen - Vereinbarkeit des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  The rulings of the Federal Courts which have already been handed down since the new law came into force relate to the admissibility of other remedies (Federal Court of Justice, order of 29 November 2012, VIII ZB 49/12), granting legal aid in connection with damage actions (Federal Court of Justice: orders of 20 December 2012; III ZA 33/12; of 8 November 2012, III ZA 27/12; of 25 October 2012 - III ZB 64/12; of 27 June 2012, III ZB 45/12; Federal Finance Court: orders of 12 March 2013, X S 12/13 (PKH)); of 26 July 2012, X S 18/12 (PKH); obligation to have counsel in damage actions (Federal Finance Court, judgment of 6 February 2013, X K 11/12), the impact of the unreasonable length of proceedings in disciplinary proceedings (Federal Administrative Court, orders of 22 January 2013 - 2 B 89.11; of 30 August 2012 - 2 B 21.12; of 1 June 2012, 2 B 123.11; of 16 May 2012 - 2 B 3.12; judgment of 29 March 2012 - Federal Administrative Court 2 A 11.10), as well as the questions concerning the degree to which the excessive length of a set of proceedings can constitute grounds for the admission of an appeal on points of law only (Federal Finance Court, order of 9 January 2013, X B 114/12), and when a delay in proceedings in breach of the rule of law applies in criminal proceedings (Federal Court of Justice, order of 5 December 2012, 1 StR 531/12).
• BVerwG, 30.08.2012 - 2 B 21.12

  Garantie des gesetzlichen Richters; dienstliche Überbeanspruchung des Richters; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

  The rulings of the Federal Courts which have already been handed down since the new law came into force relate to the admissibility of other remedies (Federal Court of Justice, order of 29 November 2012, VIII ZB 49/12), granting legal aid in connection with damage actions (Federal Court of Justice: orders of 20 December 2012; III ZA 33/12; of 8 November 2012, III ZA 27/12; of 25 October 2012 - III ZB 64/12; of 27 June 2012, III ZB 45/12; Federal Finance Court: orders of 12 March 2013, X S 12/13 (PKH)); of 26 July 2012, X S 18/12 (PKH); obligation to have counsel in damage actions (Federal Finance Court, judgment of 6 February 2013, X K 11/12), the impact of the unreasonable length of proceedings in disciplinary proceedings (Federal Administrative Court, orders of 22 January 2013 - 2 B 89.11; of 30 August 2012 - 2 B 21.12; of 1 June 2012, 2 B 123.11; of 16 May 2012 - 2 B 3.12; judgment of 29 March 2012 - Federal Administrative Court 2 A 11.10), as well as the questions concerning the degree to which the excessive length of a set of proceedings can constitute grounds for the admission of an appeal on points of law only (Federal Finance Court, order of 9 January 2013, X B 114/12), and when a delay in proceedings in breach of the rule of law applies in criminal proceedings (Federal Court of Justice, order of 5 December 2012, 1 StR 531/12).
• BVerwG, 22.01.2013 - 2 B 89.11

  Beamtenbeisitzer im gerichtlichen Disziplinarverfahren; Verwaltungszweig; …
• BGH, 05.12.2012 - 1 StR 531/12

  Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung (Beschleunigungsgebot; Bedeutung einer …
• BGH, 20.12.2012 - III ZA 33/12

  Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe bei Einlegung eines unstatthaften …
• BFH, 26.07.2012 - X S 18/12

  Entschädigungsklage wegen überlanger Verfahrensdauer - Laufzeit bis zu einem Jahr …
• BFH, 12.03.2013 - X S 12/13

  Keine Verkürzung der Sechs-Monats-Frist des § 198 Abs. 5 Satz 1 GVG - Fristbeginn …
• BGH, 08.11.2012 - III ZA 27/12

  Statthaftigkeit einer sofortigen Beschwerde gegen die Zurückweisung eines …
• BFH, 09.01.2013 - X B 114/12

  Überlange Verfahrensdauer grundsätzlich kein Verfahrensmangel
• BGH, 25.10.2012 - III ZB 64/12

  Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe für eine Beschwerde gegen …
• EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 46344/06

  Beschwerderecht gegen lange Verfahren gefordert
• BVerwG, 11.07.2013 - 5 C 23.12

  Entschädigung; angemessene -; Entschädigungsanspruch; Entschädigungsanspruch bei …
• OVG Sachsen-Anhalt, 25.07.2012 - 7 KE 1/11

  Entschädigung für überlange Verfahrensdauer
• BVerwG, 11.07.2013 - 5 C 27.12

  Enteignungsentschädigung; Entschädigung; angemessene -; Entschädigungsanspruch; …
• OLG Celle, 24.10.2012 - 23 SchH 3/12

  Ansprüche wegen überlanger Dauer eines Ermttlungs- und des anschließenden …

• EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

  McFARLANE v. IRELAND

  The Court recalls its constant case law to the effect that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant (for example, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 128, ECHR 2006-VII).

  "Remedies available to a litigant at domestic level for raising a complaint about length of proceedings are "effective"... if they prevent the alleged violation or its continuation, or provide adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 65, ECHR 2006-VII; and Kudla v. Poland, cited above, §§ 157 to 159).

• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 17.12.2013 - L 10 SF 28/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 29.08.2013 - L 10 SF 22/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.

 
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 3/12
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 1/12
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 29.08.2013 - L 10 SF 27/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 29.08.2013 - L 10 SF 26/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 29.08.2013 - L 10 SF 21/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 29.08.2013 - L 10 SF 23/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 29.08.2013 - L 10 SF 25/13
  Mit Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2010 hat der EGMR in den zusammengefassten Individualbeschwerdeverfahren des Klägers Nrn. 39778/07, 11171/08, 43336/08, 52719/08, 15895/09, 16123/09, 16127/09, 16129/09, 27529/09, 27533/09 und 27596/09 die beklagte Bundesrepublik Deutschland verurteilt, an den Kläger einmalig 30.000 EUR immateriellen Schadensersatz zu zahlen.
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 17.12.2013 - L 10 SF 29/13
• FG Hessen, 19.03.2013 - 12 K 3431/06

  Abzugsfähigkeit von Prozesskosten
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 7/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 6/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 5/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 13/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 10/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 8/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 23.11.2012 - L 18 SF 4/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 01.12.2015 - L 10 SF 6/13
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 27.11.2014 - L 10 SF 9/12
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 18.12.2014 - L 10 SF 7/13
• EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 9415/02

  TASCHINA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 10395/02

  KOCSIS c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 36505/10

  ÇELIK c. TURQUIE