Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VALERIU AND NICOLAE ROSCA v. MOLDOVA

  (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 14437/05

  MODARCA v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  Moreover, conditions of detention in that prison did not improve significantly, even by 2005 (see, for instance, Modarca v. Moldova, no. 14437/05, §§ 37, 38 and 60-69, 10 May 2007).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  While there may be obstacles or difficulties which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, it may generally be regarded as essential for the authorities to launch an investigation promptly in order to maintain public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and prevent any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 72, ECHR 2002-II).".
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  The Court observes that in the case of Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts) it held:.

• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

  SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  The relevant provisions of Law no. 1545 (1998) on compensation for damage caused by the illegal acts of the criminal investigation organs, prosecution and courts have been set out in Sarban v. Moldova (no. 3456/05, § 54, 4 October 2005).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  The Court observes that in the case of Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts) it held:.
• EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 17332/03

  LEVINTA v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  The Court recalls that beating a person's soles, or falaka, is a practice which is always intentional and can only be regarded as torture (see Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 65, 4 April 2006, and Levinta v. Moldova, no. 17332/03, § 71, 16 December 2008).
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  CORSACOV v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02

  The Court recalls that beating a person's soles, or falaka, is a practice which is always intentional and can only be regarded as torture (see Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 65, 4 April 2006, and Levinta v. Moldova, no. 17332/03, § 71, 16 December 2008).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 11353/06

  [FRE]

  Elle a pu ainsi observer une série de problèmes récurrents au sujet des prisons de ce pays, dont la surpopulation, le manque d'hygiène et de conditions matérielles appropriées, la mauvaise qualité et la quantité insuffisante de la nourriture, et l'absence de soins médicaux adéquats (voir, parmi d'autres, Becciev c. Moldova, no 9190/03, §§ 41-48, 4 octobre 2005, Holomiov, précité, §§ 113-122, Istratii, précité, §§ 48-59 et 68-72, Modarca, précité, §§ 63-69, Ciorap c. Moldova, no 12066/02, §§ 65-71, 19 juin 2007, Popovici c. Moldova, nos 289/04 et 41194/04, §§ 56-57, 27 novembre 2007, Turcan c. Moldova, no 10809/06, §§ 35-39, 27 novembre 2007, Malai c. Moldova, no 7101/06, §§ 33-35, 13 novembre 2008, Valeriu et Nicolae Rosca c. Moldova, no 41704/02, §§ 78-79, 20 octobre 2009, Gavrilovici c. Moldova, no 25464/05, §§ 42-44, 15 décembre 2009, I.D., précité, §§ 44-46, Oprea c. Moldova, no 38055/06, §§ 39-42, 21 décembre 2010, Rotaru c. Moldova, no 51216/06, §§ 33-42, 15 février 2011, Feraru c. Moldova, no 55792/08, §§ 41-46, 24 janvier 2012, Hadji c. Moldova, nos 32844/07 et 41378/07, §§ 19-20, 14 février 2012, Constantin Modarca c. République de Moldova, no 37829/08, §§ 25-27, 13 novembre 2012, Ciorap c. République de Moldova (no 3), no 32896/07, §§ 35-37, 4 décembre 2012, Mitrofan, précité, §§ 37-41, Ipati, précité, §§ 64-65 ; et Segheti, §§ 30-33).
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 38281/08

  [ENG]

  The delay of more than two years before instituting the criminal proceedings is incompatible with the procedural obligation under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for instance, Valeriu and Nicolae Rosca v. Moldova, no. 41704/02, §§ 66-70, 20 October 2009, and Paduret v. Moldova, no. 33134/03, §§ 64 and 68, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  MURDALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 2 othe applications

  That sentence was not the minimum provided by the domestic law (see paragraphs 39-41 above), and neither was it suspended - officer L. served his sentence in full (contrast Valeriu and Nicolae Roşca v. Moldova, no. 41704/02, § 73, 20 October 2009; Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 63, 20 December 2007; and, most recently, O.R. and L.R. v the Republic of Moldova, no. 24129/11, § 79, 30 October 2018).

• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02

  CORSACOV AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 18 OTHER CASES

  41704/02.
• EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 53645/10

  ATESOGLU v. TURKEY

  In these circumstances, the Court finds that the acts complained of were particularly serious, cruel, and capable of causing severe pain and suffering (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, §§ 114 and 115, ECHR 2000-VII; Valeriu and Nicolae Rosca v. Moldova, no. 41704/02, § 64, 20 October 2009 and further references therein; Diri v. Turkey, no. 68351/01, §§ 42-46, 31 July 2007; and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 34445/04, §§ 68 and 69, 1 January 2007).
• EGMR, 22.09.2022 - 40057/11

  MELIKSETYAN v. UKRAINE

  Regard being had to the multiplicity of the injuries sustained by the applicant, their dispersed locations and the circumstances in which they were sustained - including the duration of the ill-treatment, its deliberate nature, its purpose and the applicant's vulnerability vis-à-vis the officers' detaining and questioning him in blatant breach of the applicable law - the Court considers that this treatment attained the level of severity to be classified as torture (for relevant examples, see Valeriu and Nicolae Roşca v. Moldova, no. 41704/02, § 64, 20 October 2009; and Belousov v. Ukraine, no. 4494/07, §§ 67-68, 7 November 2013).
• EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11

  RADU AND RADU-CIUPERCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In reply to the applicants' arguments in respect of the leniency of the lower court's judgment and about impunity, with reference to the Court's judgments in Valeriu and Nicolae Roşca v. Moldova (no. 41704/02, 20 October 2009) and Pădureţ v. Moldova (no. 33134/03, 5 January 2010), the court found that those cases were not applicable to the present case since in both of them serious physical ill-treatment had been caused, while the applicants in the present case had only been psychologically ill-treated.