Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BASSANI c. ITALIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 6-1 Violation de P1-1 Violation de l'art. 8 Violation de P4-2 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 47778/99
• EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 47778/99
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 47778/99

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 47778/99

  La Cour rappelle avoir constaté dans de nombreux arrêts (voir, par exemple, Bottazzi c. Italie [GC], no 34884/97, § 22, CEDH 1999-V) l'existence en Italie d'une pratique contraire à la Convention résultant d'une accumulation de manquements à l'exigence du « délai raisonnable ".
• EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 32190/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 47778/99

  Le droit interne pertinent est décrit dans l'arrêt Luordo c. Italie (no 32190/96, §§ 57-61, 17 juillet 2003).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 28975/05

  [ENG]

  In a series of cases against Italy the Court found that the travel restrictions, which were automatically imposed for the whole duration of the bankrupcy proceedings and remained in force for very significant periods ranging from thirteen years to more than twenty-four years, were disproportionate even though there had been no indication that the applicant had wished to leave his place of residence or that such permission had ever been refused (see Luordo, cited above, § 96; Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, §§ 23-25, 11 December 2003; Neroni v. Italy, no. 7503/02, §§ 26-28, 22 April 2004; and Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00, §§ 19-21, 24 March 2005).
• EGMR, 10.07.2008 - 16528/05

  HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court has previously found in a series of cases against Italy that such an obligation imposed on the applicants was disproportionate in cases where the proceedings varied between thirteen years and six months and twenty-four years and five months (see Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00, § 20, 24 March 2005; Luordo v. Italy, no. 32190/96, § 96, ECHR 2003-IX; and Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, § 24, 11 December 2003).
• EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 14183/02

  ANTONENKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  This pattern was followed in subsequent cases, where the duration of an obligation not to leave one's place of residence varied from 13 years 6 months (see Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00, § 20, 24 March 2005) to 24 years 5 months (see Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, § 24, 11 December 2003).

• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 19126/02

  KOMAROVA v. RUSSIA

  Since it does not appear that the applicant actually sought to leave the area of her residence and was refused (see, Fedorov and Fedorova v. Russia, no. 31008/02, §§ 44-46, 13 October 2005) or that the overall duration of that measure - seven years and two months to date - was unjustifiably long (see, by contrast, Luordo v. Italy, no. 32190/96, § 96, ECHR 2003-IX; Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00, § 20, 24 March 2005; and Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, § 24, 11 December 2003), the Court is unable to conclude that the measure in question was arbitrary or otherwise disproportionate.
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 23592/07

  [ENG]

  They also relied on a series of cases against Italy (see Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00; Luordo v. Italy, no. 32190/96; and Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99) where the length of proceedings varied between thirteen years and six months and twenty-four years and five months, and where violations were found by the Court, and compared them with the case of Fedorov and Fedorova v. Russia, no. 31008/02, where a restriction on leaving the place of residence lasting about four years and three months was found to be proportionate.
• EGMR, 13.10.2005 - 31008/02

  FEDOROV AND FEDOROVA v. RUSSIA

  This pattern was followed in subsequent cases, where the duration of an obligation not to leave one's place of residence varied between 13 years and 6 months (see Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00, § 20, 24 March 2005) and 24 years and 5 months (see Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, § 24, 11 December 2003).
• EGMR, 03.04.2006 - 32461/02

  HRISTOV v. BULGARIA

  Furthermore, the Court considers that the circumstances of the present case are different from those in a number of cases against Italy (see Luordo v. Italy, no. 32190/96, § 96, ECHR 2003-IX; Goffi v. Italy, no. 55984/00, § 20, 24 March 2005; and Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, § 24, 11 December 2003), where the Court found disproportionate a restriction on the freedom of movement.

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BASSANI contre l'ITALIE

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 47778/99
• EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 47778/99
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 47778/99

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BASSANI contre l'ITALIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 MRK
  Recevable (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 47778/99
• EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 47778/99
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 47778/99