Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  T.V. v. CROATIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life;Article 2-2 - Use of force) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  T.V. v. CROATIA

  Art. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  Rn. 65 The Court will examine the matter in the light of the relevant general principles, as summarised, notably, in Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 5878/08, §§ 229-39, 30 March 2016).
• EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 26074/18

  HAMPLOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  Rn. 50 Finally, Article 2 of the Convention also imposes on the State the positive obligation to train its law-enforcement officials in such a manner as to ensure that they have a high level of competence and to prevent any treatment that runs contrary to that provision (see V v. the Czech Republic, no. 26074/18, § 87, 7 December 2023, and, mutatis mutandis, Tekin and Arslan, cited above, § 95).
• EGMR, 18.11.2021 - 15670/18

  Vorfall in Kroatien: Recht auf Leben an EU-Außengrenze verletzt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  15670/18 and 43115/18, § 139, 18 November 2021).

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 16538/17

  Türkei wegen Haft für Journalisten verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  Rn. 40 The Court has previously accepted that the last stage of a particular remedy may be reached after the application has been lodged but before its admissibility has been determined, as is the situation in the present case (see Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no. 23205/08, § 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538/17, § 86, 20 March 2018; and M.H. and Others v. Croatia, nos.
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that its provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 174 and 177, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and Boukrourou and Others v. France, no. 30059/15, § 54, 16 November 2017).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  As master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case before it (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114 and 124, 20 March 2018), the Court considers that the case falls to be examined under both the substantive and the procedural limbs of Article 2 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows:.
• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32245/19

  MACHALIKASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  In the light of the importance of the protection afforded by Article 2, the Court must subject allegations of a breach of this provision to the most careful scrutiny, taking into consideration not only the actions of State agents but also all the surrounding circumstances - including such matters as the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place and the planning and control of the actions under examination (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 57-59, ECHR 2004-XI; Tekin and Arslan v. Belgium, no. 37795/13, § 84, 5 September 2017; Boukrourou and Others, cited above, § 55; and Machalikashvili and Others v. Georgia, no. 32245/19, § 99, 19 January 2023).
• EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 15526/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  V.D. had previously lodged two other applications with the Court concerning his ill-treatment by the authorities and the ineffectiveness of the ensuing investigation (see V.D. v. Croatia, no. 15526/10, 8 November 2011, and V.D. v. Croatia (no. 2), no. 19421/15, 15 November 2018).
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 30059/15

  BOUKROUROU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that its provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 174 and 177, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and Boukrourou and Others v. France, no. 30059/15, § 54, 16 November 2017).
• EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 19421/15

  v.D. v. CROATIA (NO. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  V.D. had previously lodged two other applications with the Court concerning his ill-treatment by the authorities and the ineffectiveness of the ensuing investigation (see V.D. v. Croatia, no. 15526/10, 8 November 2011, and V.D. v. Croatia (no. 2), no. 19421/15, 15 November 2018).
• KG, 04.06.1915 - S 76/15

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  KALKAN v. DENMARK

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that its provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 174 and 177, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 46, 11 June 2024).

  Making its assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41 of the Convention, it awards EUR 25, 000 under this head (see also, among others, Saoud, cited above, § 140; Tekın and Arslan, cited above, § 116; and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 78, 11 June 2024).

• EGMR, 16.07.2026 - 28273/23

  S.T. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Nevertheless, irrespective of that conclusion, the Court reiterates that the very use of the prone position, even without pressure applied on the chest by kneeling on the upper back or neck area, may be dangerous and life-threatening, especially when used against vulnerable persons in an agitated state (see, for example, V v. the Czech Republic, cited above, § 97; Saoud, cited above, § 102; T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 55, 11 June 2024; and Magherini and Others, cited above, § 124).
• EGMR, 15.01.2026 - 32707/19

  MAGHERINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  R.M. was thus in a recognised state of particular vulnerability requiring a high degree of precaution in the choice of "usual" arrest techniques (see T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 58, 11 June 2024).

• EGMR, 25.11.2025 - 2390/24

  RASMUSSEN AND OTHERS v. DENMARK

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that its provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 174 and 177, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 46, 11 June 2024).
• EGMR, 16.01.2025 - 41208/21

  GHAOUI c. FRANCE

  Ainsi, les policiers impliqués ont été entendus rapidement et séparément, ce qui permettait d'éviter tout risque de collusion, de recueillir leurs versions dans un délai très court après la survenance des faits et d'éviter tout risque de déperdition, du fait de l'écoulement du temps, d'éléments ou de détails factuels importants (paragraphes 12-13 et 18 ci-dessus ; voir, a contrario, T.V. c. Croatie, no 47909/19, § 67, 11 juin 2024).
• EGMR - 6187/25 (anhängig)

  SLOVAQUIE c. BELGIQUE

  a) Le décès de M. J.C. a-t-il résulté d'un usage de la force « absolument nécessaire'au sens de l'article 2 § 2 de la Convention (voir, entre autres, Salman c. Turquie [GC], no 21986/93, § 98, CEDH 2000-VII, et Tekın et Arslan, précité, § 82), eu égard notamment à la jurisprudence de la Cour relative au recours au « plaquage ventral'comme technique de contrainte (pour un exemple récent, voir T.V. c. Croatie, no 47909/19, § 55, 11 juin 2024, et les références citées) ?.
• EGMR - 62582/19 (anhängig)

  ESPOSITO v. ITALY

  - Did the domestic authorities comply with their positive obligation to train their law-enforcement officials in such a manner as to ensure their high level of competence in their professional conduct so that no one is subjected to treatment that runs counter to the Convention (see Tekın and Arslan v. Belgium, no. 37795/13, § 95, 5 September 2017 and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 50, 11 June 2024)?.