Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RASTODER v. SLOVENIA

  No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RASTODER v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 29187/10

  SMAJGL v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  He did neither of those things (see, mutatis mutandis, Smajgl v. Slovenia, no. 29187/10, § 72, 4 October 2016, and Stefancic, cited above, § 46).
• EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80

  UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  In support of their argument, the Government relied on the Court's findings in Gani and Kostecki (both cited above), and Unterpertinger v. Austria (24 November 1986, Series A no. 110).
• EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 55287/10

  SETON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  It is also notable in this context that the admissibility of evidence is a matter for regulation by national law and the national courts and that the Court's only concern is to examine whether the proceedings have been conducted fairly (see Seton v. the United Kingdom, no. 55287/10, § 57, 31 March 2016, with further references therein).

 
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 61800/08

  GANI v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  In his opinion, the present case differed substantially from Gani v. Spain (no. 61800/08, 19 February 2013) and Kostecki v. Poland (no. 14932/09, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 8088/05

  GABRIELYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner (see Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 81, 10 April 2012).
• EuGH - C-197/01

  Nichtigerklärung der Verordnung Nr. 396/2001 der Kommission vom 27. Februar 2001 …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  On 29 May 2000 the Council of the European Union adopted the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (2000/C 197/01), which aims at facilitating mutual judicial assistance between the authorities of the Member States.
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 14932/09

  KOSTECKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  In his opinion, the present case differed substantially from Gani v. Spain (no. 61800/08, 19 February 2013) and Kostecki v. Poland (no. 14932/09, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 25.10.2012 - 18027/05

  STEFANCIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  The applicant, who seems to be suggesting that he waived his right to question the two witnesses during the investigation (see paragraph 48 above), therefore unjustifiably missed an opportunity to test their truthfulness and reliability at the pre-trial stage (see Stefancic v. Slovenia, no. 18027/05, § 44, 25 October 2012, and Gani, cited above, § 48).
• UN-Ausschuß für Menschenrechte, 04.07.1994 - 15/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13

  Section 55b, paragraph 2, of the Constitutional Court Act (Official Gazette no. 15/94 with relevant amendments) provides as follows:.

• EGMR, 02.11.2021 - 35366/15

  TARTOUSI c. ROUMANIE

  À la lumière de l'approche stricte adoptée par elle dans certaines affaires antérieures, la Cour n'est pas convaincue que « toutes les mesures raisonnables'(Al-Khawaja et Tahery, précité, § 120) aient été envisagées par la Haute Cour pour assurer la comparution d'Y.T. au procès et permettre ainsi au requérant de le faire interroger (voir, mutatis mutandis, Rastoder c. Slovénie, no 50142/13, §§ 57-58, 28 novembre 2017).
• EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 58956/12

  SULA c. ITALIE

  En conséquence, les faits de la présente affaire semblent indiquer l'absence de « motifs sérieux'justifiant la non-comparution à l'audience d'E.P. et de G.M.P. Néanmoins, l'absence d'un « motif sérieux ", tout en constituant un élément de poids s'agissant d'apprécier l'équité globale d'un procès avec les autres considérations pertinentes, ne contient pas en soi une indication concluante d'un manque d'équité de la procédure pénale (Schatschaschwili, précité, § 113, Rastoder c. Slovénie, no 50142/13, § 59, 28 novembre 2017, et Seton c. Royaume-Uni, no 55287/10, § 62, 31 mars 2016).