Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,33428) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TAYDAS v. TURKEY
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Taydas v. Turkey
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09
In particular, the force used must be strictly proportionate to the achievement of the aims set out in the subparagraphs of the Article (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-149, Series A no. 324). - EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09
Indeed, the Court has examined complaints under this provision in a number of cases where the alleged victim did not die as a result of the impugned conduct (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI); Peker (no. 2) v. Turkey, no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein; Evrim Öktem v. Turkey, no. 9207/03, §§ 42 and 43, 4 April 2008 and the cases cited therein; and compare with Mustafa Aldemir, cited above, §§ 28-31). - EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 9207/03
EVRIM ÖKTEM c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09
Indeed, the Court has examined complaints under this provision in a number of cases where the alleged victim did not die as a result of the impugned conduct (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI); Peker (no. 2) v. Turkey, no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein; Evrim Öktem v. Turkey, no. 9207/03, §§ 42 and 43, 4 April 2008 and the cases cited therein; and compare with Mustafa Aldemir, cited above, §§ 28-31). - EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 42136/06
PEKER v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09
Indeed, the Court has examined complaints under this provision in a number of cases where the alleged victim did not die as a result of the impugned conduct (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI); Peker (no. 2) v. Turkey, no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein; Evrim Öktem v. Turkey, no. 9207/03, §§ 42 and 43, 4 April 2008 and the cases cited therein; and compare with Mustafa Aldemir, cited above, §§ 28-31).
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
ATIMAN v. TURKEY
In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein).