Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GÜLBAHAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (16)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05

  N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, most recently, N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 29, 27 May 2008).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  In the absence of any explanation by the Government, who bear the burden of providing a plausible explanation for those injuries (see, in this connection, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII), the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in its substantive aspect in respect of the three applicants.
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  The Court cannot but note that the medical report of 27 July 2001 (see paragraph 13 above) lacks detail and falls significantly short of both the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), which are regularly taken into account by the Court in its examination of cases concerning ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in the Istanbul Protocol (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  The Court cannot but note that the medical report of 27 July 2001 (see paragraph 13 above) lacks detail and falls significantly short of both the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), which are regularly taken into account by the Court in its examination of cases concerning ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in the Istanbul Protocol (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 57039/00

  EPÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  The Court considers that, as noted above, the complaints made by the applicants to the prosecutors and the objections lodged by them against the prosecutors" negative decisions were relevant remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Epözdemir v. Turkey (dec.) no. 57039/00).
• EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 18207/03

  NEVRUZ KOÇ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  As for the Government's argument that the applicants had failed to bring an action against the Ministry of the Interior, the Court reiterates that it has already examined and rejected the Government's preliminary objections in similar cases (see, in particular, Nevruz Koç v. Turkey, no. 18207/03, § 31, 12 June 2007 and the case cited therein).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 41497/98

  TRIVELLATO c. ITALIE

  Arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 4 avril 2003 no 5264/03.

  La Cour observe que l'arrêt no 5264/03 rendu par la Cour de cassation a pour conséquence que lorsqu'un requérant, ayant dûment introduit une requête devant la Cour pour se plaindre de la durée d'une procédure terminée, était décédé avant l'entrée en vigueur de la loi Pinto - et avant que la Cour ne déclare sa requête recevable - ses héritiers ne pourraient ni continuer la procédure devant la Cour du fait de l'entrée en vigueur par la suite de la loi Pinto ni se voir reconnaître un droit à obtenir réparation de la durée de la procédure en droit interne.

  En effet, à l'instar de l'affaire ayant donné lieu à l'arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 4 avril 2003 no 5264/03, en l'espèce, le requérant est décédé après la fin de la procédure nationale et avant l'entrée en vigueur de la loi Pinto.

• EGMR, 25.09.2019 - 36617/07

  AFET SÜREYYA EREN AGAINST TURKEY AND 130 OTHER CASES

  5264/03.
• EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 8077/08

  KAÇMAZ v. TURKEY

  Nevertheless, in the absence of any evidence in support of the applicant's allegations, the Court considers that there has been no violation of Article 3 of the Convention in its substantive aspect in respect of the ill-treatment to which the applicant was allegedly subjected during his detention in police custody (see Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 54, 21 October 2008; and Böke and Kandemir v. Turkey, nos. 71912/01, 26968/02 and 36397/03, § 50, 10 March 2009).

• EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 77832/12

  TOKUR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Les doléances formulées par une partie des requérants au sujet des sévices qui leur auraient été infligés dans la prison de type F de Kocaeli, où ils avaient été transférés après l'opération, ont fait l'objet d'une autre requête, à savoir Gülbahar et autres c. Turquie, n° 5264/03.
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64897/01

  ERNESTINA ZULLO c. ITALIE

  b) Judgment of the Court of Cassation no. 5264/03 deposited with the registry on 4 April 2003.
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64886/01

  COCCHIARELLA v. ITALY

  b) Arrêt no 5264/03 de la Cour de cassation déposé au greffe le 4 avril 2003.
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65075/01

  GIUSEPPINA AND ORESTINA PROCACCINI v. ITALY

  b) Arrêt no 5264/03 de la Cour de cassation déposé au greffe le 4 avril 2003.
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  [ENG]

  As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as evidence for proving or disproving the applicant's allegations of ill-treatment (see Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008; Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 53, 21 October 2008; and Ballıktaş v. Turkey, no. 7070/03, § 28, 20 October 2009).
• EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 32501/11

  [ENG]

  In a number of cases the Court has stated that the positive obligation to conduct an official investigation is not limited solely to cases of ill-treatment by State agents (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII; Ay v. Turkey, no. 30951/96, § 59, 22 March 2005; and Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 72, 21 October 2008).
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 62361/00

  RICCARDI PIZZATI c. ITALIE

  b) Judgment of the Court of Cassation no. 5264/03 deposited with the registry on 4 April 2003.
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65102/01

  GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 2)
• EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 42136/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 71912/01

  BÖKE AND KANDEMIR v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64705/01

  GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 1)
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64890/01

  APICELLA v. ITALY
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64699/01

  MUSCI v. ITALY