Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ADIYAMAN v. TURKEY

  Art. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 41964/98

  CENNET AYHAN AND MEHMET SALIH AYHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  In this connection, the Court notes that the applicant, who appears to have been reluctant throughout this time to be involved in the ongoing investigation or proceedings, does not challenge the findings of the Diyarbakır Assize Court before this Court (see, a contrario, Cennet Ayhan and Mehmet Salih Ayhan v. Turkey, no. 41964/98, § 69, 27 June 2006).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-... ; and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  Having regard to the undisputed information provided by the applicant that a number of killings by unknown perpetrators had taken place in Silvan between 30 April 1992 and 14 October 1993, to its previous findings in similar Turkish cases to the effect that in 1993 and 1994, as a result of the conflict in south-east Turkey, there were rumours that contra-guerrilla elements were involved in targeting persons suspected of supporting the PKK (see, for example, Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 89, ECHR 2000-III, and Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI) and to the fact that in a number of official documents the deceased is referred to as a PKK sympathiser, the applicant's allegation that her husband was killed at least with the connivance of State agents cannot therefore be discarded as prima facie untenable.

• EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95

  FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-... ; and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95

  ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-... ; and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-... ; and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
• EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 28298/95

  BULDAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-... ; and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39541/98

  DÖLEK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-... ; and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
• EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 77200/01

  ACAT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  In view of the above, the Court concludes that the evidence in the investigation file shows that, although there were lengthy delays due to the nature of the crime, namely killing by an unknown perpetrator, and also the efforts needed to dismantle a criminal organisation such as Hizbullah, the investigation was not devoid of effect and it cannot be maintained that the authorities took no action with regard to the killing of the applicant's husband (see, for example, Bayrak and Others v. Turkey, no. 42771/98, §§ 54-55, 12 January 2006, and Acat and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77200/01, 5 April 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 39374/09

  DUB c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  À ce sujet, elle rappelle avoir déjà conclu à la non-violation du volet procédural de l'article 2 de la Convention après avoir jugé que l'enquête était adéquate et constaté que les responsables des atteintes à la vie avaient été poursuivis et/ou condamnés, quand bien même des atermoiements de la procédure avaient pu être constatés (voir, par exemple, Bayrak et autres c. Turquie, no 42771/98, §§ 54-55, 12 janvier 2006, Adiyaman c. Turquie (déc.), no 58933/00, 9 février 2010, et Sarbyanova-Pashaliyska et Pashaliyska c. Bulgarie, no 3524/14, §§ 41-43, 12 janvier 2017).
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 50265/07

  AKSARI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Quant à l'allégation de connivence des autorités étatiques avec le Hizbullah, la Cour observe que ce grief, qui ne repose sur aucun élément concret, n'est en outre aucunement étayé (Adıyaman c. Turquie (déc.), no 58933/00, 9 février 2010).