Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KJARTAN ÁSMUNDSSON v. ICELAND

  Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of P1-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KJARTAN ÁSMUNDSSON c. ISLANDE

  Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de P1-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 14 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  Asmundsson gegen Island

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.01.2003 - 60669/00
• EGMR, 12.10.2004 - 60669/00
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 60669/00

Wird zitiert von ... (27)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EuGH, 13.06.2017 - C-258/14

  Florescu u.a. - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Art. 143 AEUV - …

  Die Rechte, die sich aus der Entrichtung von Beiträgen an ein Sozialversicherungssystem ergeben, stellen daher Vermögensrechte im Sinne dieses Artikels dar (Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, 12. Oktober 2004, Kjartan Ásmundsson/Island, CE:ECHR:2004:1012JUD006066900, § 39).

  Das in diesem Artikel verankerte Eigentumsrecht kann jedoch nicht dahin ausgelegt werden, dass es einen Anspruch auf ein Ruhegehalt in bestimmter Höhe gewährt (Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, 12. Oktober 2004, Kjartan Ásmundsson/Island, CE:ECHR:2004:1012JUD006066900, § 39).

• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 17972/07

  [ENG]

  Indeed, according to the Court's case-law, even assuming that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 guarantees benefits to persons who have contributed to a social insurance system, it cannot be interpreted as entitling that person to a pension of a particular amount (Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX).

  Nor does it guarantee, as such, any right to a pension of a particular amount (see, for example, Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX; Domalewski v. Poland (dec.), no. 34610/97, ECHR 1999-V; and Jankovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000-X).

• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 21838/10

  STEFANETTI v. ITALY and 7 other applications

  Nor does it guarantee, as such, any right to a pension of a particular amount (see, for example, Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX; Domalewski v. Poland (dec.), no. 34610/97, ECHR 1999-V; Jankovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000-X; Valkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.

  The deprivation of the entirety of a pension is likely to breach the said provision (see for example, Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX, and Apostolakis v. Greece, no. 39574/07, 22 October 2009); conversely, minimal reductions to a pension or related benefits are likely not to do so (see, among many other authorities, Valkov and Others, cited above; Arras and Others v. Italy, no. 17972/07, 14 February 2012; Poulain v. France (dec.), no. 52273/08, 8 February 2011; Lenz v. Germany (dec.), no. 40862/98, ECHR 2001-X; and Jankovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000-X).

• EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 57665/12

  KOUFAKI ET ADEDY c. GRÈCE

  Τ&omikron; Δικαστήρι&omikron; θεωρεί ότι &omikron;ι περι&omikron;ρισµ&omikron;ί π&omikron;υ εισήγαγαν &omikron;ι επίδικ&omikron;ι νόµ&omikron;ι δεν µπ&omikron;ρ&omikron;Ï�ν να θεωρηθ&omikron;Ï�ν «στέρηση περι&omikron;υσίας", όπως ισχυρίζ&omikron;νται &omikron;ι πρ&omikron;σφεÏ�γ&omikron;υσες, αλλά επέµβαση στην απόλαυση τ&omikron;υ δικαιώµατ&omikron;ς στ&omikron;ν σεβασµό της περι&omikron;υσίας υπό την ένν&omikron;ια της πρώτης φράσης της πρώτης παραγράφ&omikron;υ τ&omikron;υ άρθρ&omikron;υ 1 τ&omikron;υ Î ρωτ&omikron;κόλλ&omikron;υ αριθ.1 (Kjartan Asmundsson κατά Ισλανδίας, αριθ. 60669/00, § 40, CEDH 2004-IX, πρ&omikron;αναφερόµενη απόφαση Wieczorek, § 61, Valkov και λ&omikron;ιπ&omikron;ί κατά Β&omikron;υλγαρίας, αριθ.
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 21.12.2016 - C-258/14

  Florescu u.a. - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Grundsätze des Unionsrechts - …

  {FN:22} - Vgl. EGMR, 12. Oktober 2004, Kjartan Ásmundsson/Island, CE:ECHR:2004:1012JUD006066900, § 39.
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 13341/14

  SILVA CARVALHO RICO v. PORTUGAL

  Nor does it guarantee, as such, any right to a pension of a particular amount (see, for example, Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 19, ECHR 2004-IX).
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 30614/06

  [ENG]

  Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention does not guarantee, as such, any right to a pension of a particular amount (see, for example, Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX, and Jankovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 53080/13

  BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARY

  Nor does it guarantee, as such, any right to a pension of a particular amount (see, for example, Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX).
• EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 62235/12

  Pensionskürzungen wegen Euro-Krise gebilligt

  65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2005-X and to Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX; and Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 64, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 52943/10

  DAMJANAC v. CROATIA

  Therefore, where the amount of a benefit or pension is reduced or eliminated, this may constitute an interference with possessions which requires to be justified in the general interest (see Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], no. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 54, ECHR 2005-X; Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX; and Valkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 23658/07

  CASACCHIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 34799/07

  PEJCIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 18176/05

  WIECZOREK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 19264/07

  NATALE AND OTHERS v. ITALY
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 17767/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 46286/09

  MAGGIO AND OTHERS v. ITALY
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 77575/11

  MARKOVICS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 11838/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 50636/09

  BOZIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 15189/10

  CICHOPEK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 22350/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.02.2007 - 29086/05

  VARVAROVSKY c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 44052/05

  SKROK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 29514/08

  ZIVKOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 25460/02

  SOUKUPOVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 73743/11

  N.K.M. v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 42923/10

  SULCS v. LATVIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS