Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16, 2890/17, 39541/17, 74143/16, 2883/17, 39527/17, 14307/17 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IBRAHIMOV AND MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (34) Zitiert selbst (17)
- EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85
Oberschlick ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
Moreover, Article 10 of the Convention protects not only the substance of the ideas and information expressed but also the form in which they are conveyed (see Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, § 57, Series A no. 204). - EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12
Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
The Court found that those actions constituted a mix of conduct and verbal expression and amounted to a form of artistic and political expression covered by Article 10 (see Maria Alekhina and Others v. Russia no. 38004/12, §§ 205-06, 17 July 2018). - EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 9540/07
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
Likewise, the Court has found that pouring paint on statues of Ataturk was an expressive act performed as a protest against the political regime at the time (see Murat Vural v. Turkey, no. 9540/07, §§ 54-56, 21 October 2014).
- EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 6492/11
Luzenko ./. Ukraine
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
As the Court has previously held, when it comes to allegations of political or other ulterior motives in the context of criminal prosecution, it is difficult to dissociate pre-trial detention from the criminal proceedings within which such detention had been ordered (see Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (infringement proceedings) [GC], no. 15172/13, § 185, 29 May 2019 and Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492/11, § 108, 3 July 2012). - EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 17888/12
SHVYDKA v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
Detaching a ribbon from a wreath laid by the President of Ukraine at a monument to a famous Ukrainian poet on Independence Day has also been regarded by the Court as a form of political expression (see Shvydka v. Ukraine, no. 17888/12, §§ 37-38, 30 October 2014). - EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 8460/07
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
Accordingly, in so far as the lawyer is entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, those fees were "actually incurred" (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 74, 3 February 2011). - EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15
Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
In this context, the Court agrees with the applicants that the use of video recording, be it during arrest, search or interrogation, constitutes an important safeguard against police misconduct, and the Court attaches particular importance to this type of evidence (see, for example, Sakit Zahidov, § 53, and Layijov, § 69, both cited above; Ciorap v. Republic of Moldova (no. 5), no. 7232/07, §§ 66-67, 15 March 2016; and Hentschel and Stark v. Germany, no. 47274/15, §§ 95-99, 9 November 2017). - EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06
Michail Borissowitsch Chodorkowski
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
Relying on the cases of Khodorkovskiy v. Russia (no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011) and Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia (nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, 25 July 2013), the Government stated that the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case under Article 5 of the Convention had not been applied for any purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, and strictly for the proper investigation of the serious criminal offences allegedly committed by the applicants. - EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
Having the power to decide on the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a complaint (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018), the Court considers that the applicants' complaints fall to be examined under Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention which read as follows:. - EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 69981/14
RASUL JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
In this connection, at the outset, the Court considers it necessary to have regard to the general context of the facts of this particular case (see Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69981/14, § 120, 17 March 2016). - EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14
INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 10.04.2014 - 22062/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 12.11.2015 - 51164/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
HAJILI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.03.2019 - 36416/06
[FRE]
- EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 38239/16
RUSTAMZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 7232/07
CIORAP v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 14065/15
Lacatus ./. Schweiz - Bettelverbot unverhältnismäßig
Il convient de rappeler que la Cour a précisé à maintes reprises que la liberté d'expression s'étend également à certaines formes de comportement (voir, notamment, Ibrahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 63571/16 et 5 autres, §§ 166-167, 13 février 2020, Murat Vural c. Turquie, no 9540/07, 21 octobre 2014, et Semir Güzel c. Turquie, no 29483/09, 13 septembre 2016). - EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 60561/14
S.M. c. CROATIE
Il peut se poser la question de savoir si le seuil de gravité est atteint, ou si l'on peut admettre l'absence de preuve matérielle lorsque le plaignant se trouvait sous l'autorité et le contrôle de l'État qui lui seul était en mesure de connaître les faits dénoncés ou de les établir (voir, pour un exemple récent, Ibrahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 63571/16 et 5 autres, § 89, 13 février 2020). - EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 22636/19
Oben-Ohne Protest in katholischer Kirche: Bewährungsstrafe gegen Aktivistin …
30. À cet égard et à titre liminaire, la Cour rappelle que les idées ou les opinions d'une personne peuvent s'exprimer au travers de conduites ou de comportements (voir, par exemple, Mtsaru c. République de Moldova, nos 69714/16 et 71685/16, § 29, 15 janvier 2019, 1brahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 63571/16 et 5 autres, §§ 166 et 167, 13 février 2020, et Handzhiyski c. Bulgarie, no 10783/14, § 45, 6 avril 2021) et qu'elle a déjà jugé que l'article 10 pouvait s'appliquer à des modes d'expression artistique, l'art et la création contribuant aux échanges d'idées et d'opinions (voir, notamment, Müller et autres c. Suisse, précité, §§ 27 et 33, Ulusoy et autres c. Turquie, no 34797/03, §§ 28 et 29, 3 mai 2007).
- EGMR, 03.07.2025 - 40899/22
LUDES ET THONON c. FRANCE et 2 autres affaires
Elle englobe à ce titre des types d'expression classique d'opinions ou d'informations, dans le cadre d'un discours oral ou écrit, mais également des formes de comportement (voir notamment, İbrahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaidjan, 13 février 2020, no 63571/16 et 5 autres requêtes, §§ 166-167 ; également Tatar et Faber c. Hongrie, 12 juin 2012, no 26005/08 et 26160/08).Dans ces conditions, les juridictions internes n'auraient pas dû se contenter d'effectuer une balance entre le droit à la liberté d'expression et le droit au respect des biens, ce qui ne serait en aucun cas la méthode préconisée par la jurisprudence de la Cour (Murat Vural c. Turquie, no 9540/07, 21 octobre 2014, 1brahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 63571/16 et 5 autres, 13 février 2020, et Handzhiyski c. Bulgarie, no 10783/14, 6 avril 2021), mais auraient dû caractériser le « besoin social impérieux'de prononcer leur condamnation, ce qu'elles n'auraient pas fait.
- EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 54151/11
SAVALANLI v. AZERBAIJAN
A number of relevant international documents are described in detail in the Court's judgments in Rashad Hasanov and Others v. Azerbaijan (nos. 48653/13 and 3 others, §§ 79-81, 7 June 2018), Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, §§ 79-80, 20 September 2018) and Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, § 83, 13 February 2020).63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 113-30, 13 February 2020).
- EGMR, 13.01.2026 - 14307/17
GAHRAMAN v. AZERBAIJAN
Rn. 1 At the time of the events, the applicant was a member of the Nida civic movement ("NIDA" - for more information about the movement, see Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, § 7, 13 February 2020).Rn. 33 The Court observes that, as in Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, 13 February 2020), in the present case the applicant was a member of NIDA.
- EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 10783/14
HANDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIA
63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 166-67, 13 February 2020). - EGMR - 27618/21 (anhängig)
SILGIR v. GERMANY
63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 113-131, 13 February 2020)?. - EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 74009/16
GAHRAMANLI v. AZERBAIJAN
63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 113-33, 13 February 2020; and Savalanli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 113-33, 13 February 2020; and Savalanli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15
KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
Having regard to the seriousness of the allegations made by the applicant and the level of persuasion required in this context, the Court will closely scrutinise the investigative measures carried out prior to and after the applicant's arrest and the evidence collected by the authorities (see, for a similar context, Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, § 117, 13 February 2020). - EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 9626/14
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 28.05.2024 - 4573/22
ZAREMA MUSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 32734/11
FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 65583/13
MAMMAD AZIZOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 27.01.2026 - 71556/16
ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
- EGMR, 07.10.2025 - 62/20
IMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 4161/13
KARUYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 44153/15
SKORUPA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 38239/16
RUSTAMZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 27753/19
EL-ASMAR v. DENMARK
- EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 6180/15
AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
- VG Würzburg, 28.10.2021 - W 7 K 21.30163
Herkunftsland Aserbaidschan, Folgeantrag, herausgehobene exilpolitische …
- EGMR - 4566/19 (anhängig)
BAKHISHLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 13830/18 (anhängig)
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
- EGMR, 22.09.2022 - 11899/17
RYBIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 28154/20
ETE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR - 49076/21 (anhängig)
ABBASOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 18316/22 (anhängig)
RZAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 18839/24 (anhängig)
ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 15 other applications
- EGMR - 8174/23 (anhängig)
ORUJOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 26771/21 (anhängig)
IBRAHIM v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 47984/19 (anhängig)
BAGIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 34247/18 (anhängig)
IBRAHIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".