Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RÍMSKOKATOLICKÁ FARNOST OBRÍSTVÍ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 121, ECHR 2001-IX; and Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 146, ECHR 2001-XII), the Court considers that an award under this head is appropriate.
• EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99

  Metropolitankirche von Bessarabien u.a. ./. Moldawien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 121, ECHR 2001-IX; and Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 146, ECHR 2001-XII), the Court considers that an award under this head is appropriate.
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  Having regard to the circumstances of the present case and its case-law concerning claims for non-pecuniary damage made by legal persons or organisations (see Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey [GC], no. 23885/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-VIII; Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV; Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 23885/94

  Freiheits- und Demokratie-Partei (ÖZDEP) ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  Having regard to the circumstances of the present case and its case-law concerning claims for non-pecuniary damage made by legal persons or organisations (see Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey [GC], no. 23885/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-VIII; Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV; Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 04.03.2003 - 44965/98

  MOLNAROVA AND KOCHANOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  Therefore, the measure adopted by the Government could not be regarded as sufficient and capable of achieving satisfactory results (see, mutatis mutandis, Molnárová and Kochanová v. Slovakia, no. 44965/98, § 32, and Guincho v. Portugal, judgment of 10 July 1984, § 40).
• EGMR, 22.02.2001 - 31382/96

  KURZAC v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01

  Nonetheless, a temporary backlog of business might not involve liability on the part of the Contracting States provided that they take, with the requisite promptness, remedial action to deal with an exceptional situation of this kind (see mutatis mutandis, Kurzac v. Poland, no. 31382/96, § 34, 22 February 2001, and Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, judgment of 13 July 1983, § 29).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.05.2013 - 41486/98

  CASES OF BORÁNKOVÁ AND HARTMAN AND 69 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  65196/01.
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10

  BALAKCHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007).
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 6194/11

  VALCHEVA v. BULGARIA and 1 other application

  Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007).