Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ARRIGO AND VELLA v. MALTA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 13,, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (28)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 6569/04

  The Court recalls that this provision cannot prevent the authorities from informing the public about criminal investigations in progress (Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 17, § 38).
• EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

  PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 6569/04

  It is true that the applicants' request for a stay of the criminal proceedings had been rejected; however, the effectiveness of a remedy does not depend on the certainty of a favourable outcome (Pine Valley Developments Ltd and others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 27, § 66).
• EGMR, 05.12.2002 - 34896/97

  CRAXI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 6569/04

  Moreover, the Court considers that in a democratic society it is inevitable that information is imparted when a serious charge of misconduct in office is brought, as in the present case, against two high-ranked magistrates (see, mutatis mutandis, Craxi v. Italy, no. 34896/97, § 103, 5 December 2002).
• EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 48297/99

  BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 6569/04

  The fact that the applicants had important duties in the national judicial system at the time of the alleged offence required the highest State officials, including the Prime Minister, to keep the public informed of the alleged offence and the ensuing criminal proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Butkevičius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 50, ECHR 2002-II).
• EKMR, 01.07.1991 - 15921/89

  R.D. c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 6569/04

  However, it is not impossible that a particular procedural element could be so decisive that the fairness of the proceedings could be determined at an earlier stage (see R.D. v. Spain, no. 15921/89, Commission decision of 1 July 1991, Decisions and Reports (DR) 71, pp.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 28005/12

  M.N. AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO

  The Court notes that under its criminal head Article 6 starts to apply from the moment the person is affected by the investigation, however, the question whether or not court proceedings satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can only be determined by examining the proceedings as a whole, i.e. once they have been concluded (see, for example, Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 6091/06

  [FRE]

  La Cour a souligné à plusieurs reprises que le choix des termes employés par les agents de l'État dans les déclarations qu'ils formulent avant qu'une personne n'ait été jugée et reconnue coupable d'une infraction revêt une importance particulière (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Daktaras, no 42095/98, § 41, 10 octobre 2000, Arrigo et Vieille c. Malte (déc.), no 6569/04, 10 mai 2005, et Khoujine et autres c Russie, no 13470/02, § 94, 23 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 17053/20

  BAVCAR v. SLOVENIA

  Rn. 107 The Court has considered that in a democratic society it is inevitable that information is imparted when a serious charge of misconduct in office is brought (see Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).

• EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA

  The Court has considered that in a democratic society it is inevitable that information is imparted when a serious charge of misconduct in office is brought (see Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 53466/07

  [FRE]

  The Court reiterates that the principle of the presumption of innocence is above all a procedural safeguard, and one of the elements of a fair criminal trial required by Article 6 de the Convention (see, in this regard, Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005, and, more generally, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308).
• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

  RIMSÄ'VICS v. LATVIA and 1 other application

  Rn. 47 The Court reiterates that the principle of the presumption of innocence is above all a procedural safeguard, and one of the elements of a fair criminal trial required by Article 6 of the Convention (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 19866/04

  [FRE]

  Se référant aux décisions Arrigo et Vella c. Malte ((déc.), no 6569/04, 10 mai 2005) et F.A. c. Turquie ((déc.), no 36094/97, 1er février 2005), il avance notamment qu'il existe un intérêt légitime à informer le public.
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 39602/05

  FEDORENKO v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence enshrined in Article 6 § 2 of the Convention is one of the elements of a fair criminal trial required by Article 6 § 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 11682/03

  IGARS v. LATVIA

  For this reason the Court has often held that applicants are expected to raise allegations of a breach of the presumption of innocence within the context of criminal proceedings against them (see, for example, Shagin v. Ukraine, no. 20437/05, § 71, 10 December 2009, and Dovzhenko v. Ukraine, no. 36650/03, § 42, 12 January 2012), in order to give the criminal courts an opportunity to place the applicants, as far as possible, in the position they would have been in had the requirements of Article 6 not been disregarded (see, mutatis mutandis, Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 30970/19

  ESPÍRITO SANTO SILVA SALGADO c. PORTUGAL

  Rn. 89 La Cour considère que dans une société démocratique il est inévitable que le public soit informé lorsqu'une personne est accusée de faits graves d'inconduite dans l'exercice de ses fonctions (Arrigo et Vella c. Malte (déc.), no 6569/04, 10 mai 2005).
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 39712/16

  YILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 21218/12

  CIVINSKAITÄ- v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 36921/07

  MIROSLAW GARLICKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 57435/09

  PAULIKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 40523/08

  PESA v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 14348/02

  GARYCKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 38244/03

  ABDILLA v. MALTA
• EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 34373/13

  DIMECH v. MALTA
• EGMR, 05.09.2006 - 17056/06

  MICALLEF v. MALTA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 20758/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 23243/13

  FENECH v. MALTA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 6368/10

  PERME v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 50624/09

  KORNILOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.02.2019 - 62321/13

  MARZECKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 30651/03

  PACE v. MALTA
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 29686/10

  ZIOBRO v. POLAND
• EGMR, 11.03.2008 - 1345/06

  NIEDZWIEDZ v. POLAND
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 18105/13

  SAVER v. SLOVENIA