Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SINCAR v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 18 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (1)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

  BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2002 - 70835/01

  The Court finds that the applicant has failed to substantiate the existence of any special circumstances which might have excused her from observing the time-limit laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.) no. 38587/97, to be published and Haralambidis and Others v. Greece (dec.) no. 36706/97, 29 March 2001).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27305/95

  KOKU v. TURKEY

  Indeed, a number of attacks carried out against, or killings of, politicians belonging to these political parties have been examined by the Court (see, inter alia, Binbay v. Turkey (friendly settlement), no. 24922/94, 21 October 2004; Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 25625/94, 18 July 2000; Nuray Şen (no. 2) v. Turkey, no. 25354/94, 30 March 2004; Sincar v. Turkey (dec.), 10 October 2002, no. 70835/01; Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, ECHR 2002-II (extracts); Macır v. Turkey, no. 28516/95, 22 April 2004).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 17730/07

  [ENG]

  The Court recalls that the six-month period under Article 35 § 1 begins to run on the day after the date on which the final domestic decision was pronounced or communicated to the applicant or his lawyer or, where pursuant to domestic law and practice the applicant is automatically entitled to be served with a written copy of the judgment, from the date of receipt (see Sincar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 70835/01, 10 October 2002).
• EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 26589/06

  [ENG]

  In the same judgment the Court pointed out that dozens of politicians working for HADEP and its predecessors had been kidnapped, injured and killed at around the time of the death of the brother of the applicant in question, and that some of those incidents had been examined by the Court (see, inter alia, Binbay v. Turkey (friendly settlement), no. 24922/94, 21 October 2004; Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 25625/94, 18 July 2000; Nuray Şen (no. 2) v. Turkey, no. 25354/94, 30 March 2004; Sincar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 70835/01, 10 October 2002; Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, ECHR 2002-II (extracts); and Macır v. Turkey, no. 28516/95, 22 April 2004).