Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.W. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  S.W. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  Furthermore, not all differences in treatment - or failure to treat differently persons in relevantly different situations - constitute discrimination, but only those devoid of an "objective and reasonable justification", that is, if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or if there is not a "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452/14, § 135, 19 December 2018; Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574/08, § 56, ECHR 2013 (extracts); and D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 8017/11

  BOECKEL AND GESSNER-BOECKEL v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  The parties have not disputed, and the Court sees no reason to hold otherwise, that this issue falls under the concepts of private and family life within the meaning of the Court's case-law and therefore under the scope of Article 8 of the Convention (see also Gözüm v. Turkey, no. 4789/10, §§ 44-54, 20 January 2015, which concerned the inability under Turkish law for an adoptive mother to have her forename entered in the civil status register and recorded on her child's identity papers in place of the biological mother's forename, and Boeckel and Gessner-Boeckel v. Germany (dec.), no. 8017/11, § 27, 7 May 2013, which concerned a dispute about the domestic authorities' refusal to issue a birth certificate in the manner requested by the child's same-sex parents).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  As regards the notion of "private life" under Article 8 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that it is a broad concept not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see, for example, Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III; and Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003-I).

• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  The existence or non-existence of "family life", on the other hand, is essentially a question of fact depending upon the existence of close personal ties (see Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 31, Series A no. 31, and K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 150, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  As regards the notion of "private life" under Article 8 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that it is a broad concept not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see, for example, Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III; and Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003-I).
• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  In both the negative and positive contexts, regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts, the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see, among other authorities, Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290, and Różański v. Poland, no. 55339/00, § 61, 18 May 2006).
• EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  According to settled case-law, the notion of necessity implies that the interference corresponds to a pressing social need and, in particular, that it is proportionate to one of the legitimate aims pursued by the authorities (see, for example, Tysiąc v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 109, ECHR 2007-I, and Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 67, Series A no. 130).
• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  According to settled case-law, the notion of necessity implies that the interference corresponds to a pressing social need and, in particular, that it is proportionate to one of the legitimate aims pursued by the authorities (see, for example, Tysiąc v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 109, ECHR 2007-I, and Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 67, Series A no. 130).
• EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  Furthermore, Article 8 does not merely compel the State to abstain from such interference: in addition to this primarily negative undertaking, there may be positive obligations inherent in effective respect for private and family life (see Lozovyye v. Russia, no. 4587/09, § 36, 24 April 2018, and Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 31, Series A no. 297-C).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11

  HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 1928/19

  This is indispensable for the protection mechanism of the Convention to be set in motion (see Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, § 73, 13 November 2012).
• EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 4587/09

  LOZOVYYE v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.04.2023 - 53568/18

  O.H. v. GERMANY and 1 other application

  Der Bundesgerichtshof stellte außerdem klar, dass nur eine begrenzte Anzahl von Personen, die im Allgemeinen Kenntnis von der Transsexualität der betroffenen Person hätten (…siehe Rdnr. 26), berechtigt seien, eine vollständige Kopie der Geburtsurkunde zu beantragen, während alle anderen Personen ein berechtigtes Interesse an einer solchen Kopie geltend machen müssten (…siehe mutatis mutandis Y. ./. Polen, a.a.O., Rdnr. 79, und S.W. und andere ./. Österreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 1928/19, Rdnr. 50, 6.
• EGMR, 04.04.2023 - 7246/20

  Keine Menschenrechtsverletzung: Transpersonen können Mutter- und Vaterschaft …

  Der Bundesgerichtshof hatte außerdem klargestellt, dass nur eine begrenzte Anzahl von Personen, die im Allgemeinen Kenntnis von der Transsexualität der betroffenen Person hätten, berechtigt seien, eine vollständige Abschrift der Geburtsurkunde zu beantragen, während alle anderen Personen ein rechtliches Interesse an einer solchen Kopie geltend machen müssten (…siehe mutatis mutandis Y. ./. Polen, a. a. O., Rdnr. 79, und S.W. u. a. ./. Österreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 1928/19, Rdnr. 50, 6.