Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION CENTRE OF KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETIES IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (15)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  Subsections 2 to 6 describe various types of public events (see, for details, Krupko and Others, cited above, § 22, and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 218-42, 7 February 2017).

  Interference with the right to freedom of assembly does not need to amount to an outright ban, legal or de facto, but can consist in various other measures taken by the authorities (see Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-04, 7 February 2017).

• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The situations where a gathering may be legitimately banned in relation to the substance of the message which its participants wish to convey are rare, and the domestic authorities are not at liberty to prohibit a public event from being held simply because they consider that its "message" is wrong (see Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 135, 12 June 2014).

• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01

  Verweigerung der Zuerkennung von Rechtspersönlichkeit an Scientology-Kirchen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The action plan provided for the participation of State officials, educators, and representatives of "traditional denominations" (as listed in the Preamble to the Religions Act, see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 49, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  Kokkinakis ./. Griechenland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  Article 9 lists a number of forms which manifestation of one's religion or belief may take, namely, worship, teaching, practice and observance (see Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A).
• EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 58911/00

  Rechtssache L. e.V. u.a gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The Court has also acknowledged that, even where applicants have not been personally targeted by hostile speech, they may be considered "victims" in the sense of being affected by remarks and expressions disparaging the religious movement or ethnic group to which they belonged (see Leela Förderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911/00, §§ 8 and 79, 6 November 2008, and Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, § 53, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  BEIZARAS ET LEVICKAS c. LITUANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The standing of associations to bring legal proceedings in defence of their members' interests has been recognised in the legislation of many member States and upheld by the Court (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-III, and Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 81, 14 January 2020).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The standing of associations to bring legal proceedings in defence of their members' interests has been recognised in the legislation of many member States and upheld by the Court (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-III, and Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 81, 14 January 2020).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  Lacking that essential information about the domestic remedy, the Court rejects the Government's plea of non-exhaustion for being unsubstantiated (see Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 205, 13 July 2006).
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 26587/07

  KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 68059/13

  V.K. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.11.2001 - 53430/99

  FEDERATION CHRETIENNE DES TEMOINS DE JEHOVAH DE FRANCE v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 47429/09

  PEROVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 34150/04

  POGULYAYEV v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 29443/20

  SPÎNU c. ROUMANIE

  Cette liberté figure, dans sa dimension religieuse, parmi les éléments les plus essentiels de l'identité des croyants et de leur conception de la vie, mais elle est aussi un bien précieux pour les athées, les agnostiques, les sceptiques ou les indifférents (Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov c. Russie, no 37477/11, § 37, 23 novembre 2021).
• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  KOGAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Lastly, the Court does not lose sight of the overall hostile context and the political and social climate in which many NGOs, human rights defenders and other civil society actors were operating in the past years in Russia, including severe restrictions on their funding or on their projects resulting in significant "chilling effect" on their activities (see Ecodefence and Others v. Russia, nos. 9988/13 and 60 others, 14 June 2022; Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, §§ 8-10, 41-42, 23 November 2021; RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, § 91, 11 May 2021; and Navalnyy, cited above, §§ 147-52 and 172-75).
• OLG Frankfurt, 04.06.2024 - 16 W 17/24

  Bestandsdatenauskunft gegenüber einem Online-Videoportal wegen Volksverhetzung

  Gleichermaßen nicht gestützt werden kann das Verneinen einer Aktivlegitimation der Religionsgemeinschaften auch auf die interpretationsleitend zu berücksichtigende (…vgl. BGH, Urt. v. 5.12.2023 - VI ZR 1214/20 -, Rn. 19) Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte, der im Gegenteil die Klagebefugnis religiöser Vereinigungen zur Verteidigung der Interessen ihrer Mitglieder auch für Fälle bestätigt hat, in denen keine persönliche Betroffenheit einzelner Mitglieder, sondern nur der Gruppe vorliegt, die verunglimpft wird (vgl. EGMR, Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia v. Russia, Urt. v. 23.11.2021, Nr. 37477/11, § 30).

• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 56862/15

  TONCHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Ainsi, dans deux arrêts plus récents, Leela Förderkreis e.V. et autres (précité) et Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov c. Russie (no 37477/11, 23 novembre 2021), la Cour a considéré que l'évocation en termes hostiles ou péjoratifs d'une communauté religieuse dans des documents émis par des autorités publiques, dans la mesure où elle était susceptible d'avoir des conséquences négatives sur l'exercice par ses membres de leur liberté de religion, suffisait à constituer une atteinte aux droits garantis par l'article 9 de la Convention (Leela Förderkreis e.V. et autres, précité, § 84, et Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov, précité, § 38).
• EGMR - 39038/21 (anhängig)

  PLATT v. TÜRKİYE and 2 other applications

  In their exercise of the freedoms protected under Article 9 of the Convention, were the applicants victims of discrimination on grounds of their religion, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 9 (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, §§ 35-44, 23 November 2021, and Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, §§ 48-57, 7 March 2023)?.
• EGMR - 37814/21 (anhängig)

  WILSON v. TÜRKİYE and 19 other applications

  In their exercise of the freedoms protected under Article 9 of the Convention, were the applicants victims of discrimination in relation to their religion, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 9 (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, §§ 35-44, 23 November 2021; and Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, §§ 48-57, 7 March 2023)?.
• EGMR - 37303/24 (anhängig)

  PÜHTITSA JUMALAEMA UINUMISE STAVROPIGIAALNE NAISKLOOSTER v. ESTONIA and 1 other …

  Has there been an interference with the applicants' freedom of religion, within the meaning of Article 9 § 1 of the Convention in the context of the Riigikogu's political statement (see Tonchev and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 56862/15, §§ 52-53, 13 December 2022; Leela Förderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911/00, § 84, 6 November 2008; and Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, § 38, 23 November 2021)?.
• EGMR, 12.09.2024 - 24477/23

  SHRI RAM CHANDRA MISSION FRANCE c. FRANCE

  Ces rapports n'ont pas davantage fait l'objet d'une distribution aux autorités, aux partenaires de l'association requérante ou à des personnes susceptibles d'interagir avec elle (voir, mutatis mutandis, Aksu c. Turquie [GC], nos 4149/04 et 41029/04, § 87, CEDH 2012, et, a contrario, Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov c. Russie, no 37477/11, 23 novembre 2021, et Tonchev et autres, précité).