Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 3800/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,2631) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GIURGIU v. ROMANIA
Art. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GIURGIU c. ROUMANIE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 6586/03
BRANDUSE c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 3800/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 3800/10
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 56664/08
FLAMÎNZEANU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 3800/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)). - EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 25867/03
IAMANDI c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 3800/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)). - EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13099/04
LAUTARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 3800/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)).