Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,47879) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STECHER v. AUSTRIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
STECHER v. AUSTRIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16
The existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16
However, once this burden of proof has been discharged, it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government was in fact exhausted or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from the requirement (see, inter alia, V v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00
AZINAS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16
The Court reiterates that the object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities to address allegations that a Convention right has been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III and Kud??a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16
Under Article 35 of the Convention, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies that are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII, with further references). - EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16
The existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).