Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56761) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BÜYÜKKOL v. TURKEY
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Büyükkol v. Turkey
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96
Schießbefehl
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09
It reiterates that it is not a court of fourth instance and it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II; and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, §§ 32-34, 29 November 2007). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, §§ 42 - 46, ECHR 2000-VII; and Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, §§ 26 - 29, 16 July 2009). - EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 21086/04
DANESHPAYEH c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, §§ 42 - 46, ECHR 2000-VII; and Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, §§ 26 - 29, 16 July 2009). - EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 66446/01
GÖKTAS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09
It reiterates that it is not a court of fourth instance and it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II; and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, §§ 32-34, 29 November 2007). - EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 51760/99
CAMILLERI v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09
It also points out that it is not its task to review the assessment of evidence by a national court, unless it is arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (see Camilleri v. Malta (dec.), no. 51760/99, 16 March 2000).