Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 63233/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,61770) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 63233/09
If the restriction is compatible with these principles, no violation of Article 6 will arise (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 92-93, ECHR 2001-V). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 63233/09
Where the individual's access is limited either by operation of law or in fact, the Court will examine whether the limitation imposed impaired the essence of the right and, in particular, whether it pursued a legitimate aim and there was a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93, and Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, 21 September 2004, §§ 28-29). - EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 42049/98
ZWIAZEK NAUCZYCIELSTWA POLSKIEGO v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 63233/09
Where the individual's access is limited either by operation of law or in fact, the Court will examine whether the limitation imposed impaired the essence of the right and, in particular, whether it pursued a legitimate aim and there was a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93, and Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, 21 September 2004, §§ 28-29).