Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.02.2000 - 31253/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,34548) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.02.2000 - 31253/96
- EGMR, 21.11.2001 - 31253/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79
Inze ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2000 - 31253/96
In so far as the applicant further complains under Article 14 of the Convention that the United Kingdom Government claimed in Ireland an immunity that the law of their country does not give any other Government, the Court recalls that Article 14 does not have an independent existence (see the Inze v. Austria judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 17, § 36). - EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82
BOZANO v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2000 - 31253/96
The Court notes that the application concerns neither the applicant's detention in any of the two Contracting Parties nor his "security of person" within the meaning of Article 5 as interpreted by the Convention organs (cf. Bozano v. France judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, pp. 23 and 26, §§ 54 and 60 and Application No. 10475/83, Dec. 9.10.84, D.R. 39, p. 246). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2000 - 31253/96
As to the argument of the Irish Government according to which the applicant has not exhausted domestic remedies because he did not sue in Northern Ireland, the Court observes that the purpose of the domestic remedies rule is to give the respondent State the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against it (Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 19, § 36). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76
VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2000 - 31253/96
However, the Court recalls that, in accordance with the case-law, the mere existence of doubts as to the prospects of success of a remedy does not absolve an applicant from exhausting it (application No. 12268/86, Dec. 7.9.88, D.R. 56, p. 62 and, mutatis mutandis, Van Oosterwijk v. Belgium judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 18, § 37).