Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SORVISTO v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 6-1 Violations of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46544/99

  Fall K. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  Although the Court is not bound by domestic scales and practices, it may derive assistance from them (see, among other authorities, Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, § 90, ECHR 2002-I).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  An individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, for the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 34, Series A no. 238, and Schlader v. Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).
• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  In a sphere covered by written law, the "law" is the enactment in force as the competent courts have interpreted it (see, inter alia, Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 43, ECHR 2002-III).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  However, the Court observes in this connection that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention imposes on the Contracting States the duty to organise their legal systems in such a way that their courts can meet each of the requirements of that provision, including the obligation to decide cases within a reasonable time (see Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

  SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  Moreover, as the Court already found in the Sallinen case (cited above, § 89), there was no independent or judicial supervision when granting the search warrant as the decision to authorise the order was taken by the police themselves (see mutatis mutandis, Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, §§ 34-35, Series A no. 176-A; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 90, Series A no. 61).
• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  As to the Article 13 complaint, the Court sees no reason to depart from its findings that no specific remedy against unreasonable length of civil proceedings is available under Finnish law (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 82, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85

  KRUSLIN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  Moreover, as the Court already found in the Sallinen case (cited above, § 89), there was no independent or judicial supervision when granting the search warrant as the decision to authorise the order was taken by the police themselves (see mutatis mutandis, Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, §§ 34-35, Series A no. 176-A; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 90, Series A no. 61).
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  An individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, for the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 34, Series A no. 238, and Schlader v. Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10461/83

  CHAPPELL c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 19348/04

  In this respect, the Court notes that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited, it being in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply that law (see, inter alia, Chappell v. the United Kingdom, 30 March 1989, § 54, Series A no. 152-A).
• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 27156/02

  MORBY contre le LUXEMBOURG

• BVerfG, 20.05.2010 - 2 BvR 1413/09

  Strafrechtliche Verurteilung eines Strafverteidigers wegen Beleidigung aufgrund …

  Die Korrespondenz zwischen einem Strafverteidiger und seinem Mandanten unterliegt dem Schutz des Art. 8 Abs. 1 EMRK (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 13. Januar 2009 - Sorvisto ./. Finnland, 19348/04 -, Rn. 104 ff.).
• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 6406/21

  M.G. v. LITHUANIA

  Moreover, according to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, mitigation of the sentence was an appropriate means of redress for lengthy criminal proceedings (the Supreme Court referred to, among other authorities, Einarsson v. Iceland, no. 22596/93, Commission decision of 5 April 1995; Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, § 27, 26 June 2001; and Sorvisto v. Finland, no. 19348/04, § 66, 13 January 2009).
• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 1944/10

  MATEESCU v. ROMANIA

  Accordingly, the wording of the legal provisions regulating the practice of the profession of lawyer was not sufficiently foreseeable to enable the applicant - even though, being aspiring lawyer, he was informed and well-versed in the law - to realise that the concurrent practice of another profession, not enumerated among those excluded by the law, entailed the denial of his right to practise as lawyer (see, for instance, N.F. v. Italy, no. 37119/97, § 31, ECHR 2001-IX; Sorvisto v. Finland, no. 19348/04, § 119, 13 January 2009; and Ternovszky v. Hungary, no. 67545/09, § 26, 14 December 2010).
• EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 28926/10

  VINKS AND RIBICKA v. LATVIA

  The Government considered that the cases of Zubal v. Slovakia (no. 44065/06, § 49, 9 November 2010) and Sorvisto v. Finland (no. 19348/04, § 128, 13 January 2009) were similar to the instant case.
• EGMR, 04.02.2010 - 31407/07

  MALKOV v. ESTONIA

  In cases concerning the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the national authorities can afford adequate redress, in particular by reducing the applicant's sentence in an express and measurable manner (see, among others, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 77, ECHR 2006-V; Sorvisto v. Finland, no. 19348/04, § 66, 13 January 2009; Beck, cited above; and Kaletsch v. Germany, (dec.), no. 31890/06, 23 June 2009).