Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,45) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MANIC v. LITHUANIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Manic v. Lithuania
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MANIC v. LITHUANIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11
- EGMR, 24.04.2019 - 46600/11
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
KEEGAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11
In both contexts, regard must be had to the fair balance to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11
Where contacts with the parent might appear to threaten those interests or interfere with those rights, it is for the national authorities to strike a fair balance between them (see Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 58, Series A no. 299-A). - EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90
McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11
In this connection the Court reiterates that whilst Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, the decision-making process leading to measures of interference must be fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded by Article 8 (see McMichael v. the United Kingdom, 24 February 1995, § 87, Series A no. 307-B). - EGMR, 27.11.1992 - 13441/87
OLSSON c. SUÈDE (N° 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11
This applies not only to cases dealing with the compulsory taking of children into public care and the implementation of care measures (see, among other authorities, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2), 27 November 1992, § 90, Series A no. 250), but also to cases where contact and residence disputes concerning children arise between parents and/or other members of the children's family (see Fusca v. Romania, no. 34630/07, § 34, 13 July 2010). - EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 35228/03
BOGUMIL c. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 46600/11
States are in general not responsible for the acts and omissions of lawyers, including State-appointed lawyers, who are independent (see, inter alia, Czekalla v. Portugal, no. 38830/97, § 60, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sannino v. Italy, no. 30961/03, § 49, ECHR 2006-VI; and Bogumil v. Portugal, no. 35228/03, § 46, 7 October 2008).