Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KASA v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47).
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  Even if certain facts remain unclear, the Court considers, in the light of all the material produced before it, that there is a sufficient factual and evidentiary basis on which to assess the case, taking as a starting point the findings of the national court (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 47, ECHR 2004-XI, and Perk and Others v. Turkey, no. 50739/99, § 57, 28 March 2006).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  As regards the first limb of the Government's submissions, the Court reiterates that it is sufficient that the complaints intended to be made subsequently before it should have been raised, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements before the national authorities (see Gökçe and Demirel v. Turkey, no. 51839/99, § 63, 22 June 2006, and Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  The circumstances in which deprivation of life may be justified must therefore be strictly construed (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-2440, §§ 102-104; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80-87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV; and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-2440, §§ 102-104; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80-87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV; and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  Though the Court is not bound by the findings of domestic authorities, in normal circumstances it requires cogent elements to lead it to depart from the findings of fact reached by those authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 18, §§ 29-30).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 137, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a use of lethal force may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 395, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93

  KILIÇ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99

  The first sentence of Article 2 § 1 enjoins the State not only to refrain from the intentional and unlawful taking of life, but also to take appropriate steps within its internal legal order to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction (see Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 62, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

  VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 50739/99

  PERK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 51839/99

  GÖKÇE AND DEMIREL v. TURKEY

• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05

  DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Since McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom (27 September 1995, Series A no. 324) the Court has had to deal with a number of cases in which the police had used force, typically firearms, against armed or dangerous individuals (see, among other authorities, Andronicou and Constantinou, cited above, §§ 181-86 and 191-93; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, §§ 79-83, 14 December 2000; Brady v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 55151/00, 3 April 2001; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 64-71, ECHR 2004-XI; Bubbins v. the United Kingdom, no. 50196/99, §§ 138-52, ECHR 2005-II (extracts); Perk and Others v. Turkey, no. 50739/99, §§ 58-73, 28 March 2006; Halit Çelebi v. Turkey, no. 54182/00, §§ 49-52, 2 May 2006; Yüksel ErdoÄŸan and Others v. Turkey, no. 57049/00, §§ 91-101, 15 February 2007; Huohvanainen v. Finland, no. 57389/00, §§ 96-109, 13 March 2007; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, §§ 280-82 and 288-89, ECHR 2007-II; Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 52-56, 12 June 2007; Ekrem v. Turkey, no. 75632/01, §§ 56-61, 12 June 2007; Usta and Others v. Turkey, no. 57084/00, §§ 51-61, 21 February 2008; Kasa v. Turkey, no. 45902/99, §§ 82-89, 20 May 2008; Gülen v. Turkey, no. 28226/02, §§ 33-39, 14 October 2008; Golubeva v. Russia, no. 1062/03, §§ 94-111, 17 December 2009; Wasilewska and Kalucka v. Poland, nos.