Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PLESHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PLESHKOV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  Art. 11, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (22)

• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  42525/07 and 60800/08, § 110, 10 January 2012).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  It is incumbent on the Government to illustrate the practical effectiveness of the remedy with examples from the case-law of the domestic courts (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 219, ECHR 2012, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  The Court reiterates that the purpose of Article 35 § 1 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right - usually through the courts - the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I).

 
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 43572/18

  GRZEDA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  I do not wish to give a fully-fledged opinion, but rather to express briefly my disagreement since, already in a number of separate opinions, I have more fully explained what I consider to be the logical fallacy contained in the ritual formula used in point 6 of the operative provisions to avoid affording victims of a Convention violation any monetary award in respect of non-pecuniary damage (see, inter alia, paragraphs 22-38 of my partly concurring, partly dissenting opinion in Yüksel Yalçinkaya v. Türkiye [GC], no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023, and the joint partly dissenting opinion I authored with Judge Felici in Grzeda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, 15 March 2022).
• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 15669/20

  YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKIYE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  I do not wish to give a fully-fledged opinion, but rather to express briefly my disagreement since, already in a number of separate opinions, I have more fully explained what I consider to be the logical fallacy contained in the ritual formula used in point 6 of the operative provisions to avoid affording victims of a Convention violation any monetary award in respect of non-pecuniary damage (see, inter alia, paragraphs 22-38 of my partly concurring, partly dissenting opinion in Yüksel Yalçinkaya v. Türkiye [GC], no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023, and the joint partly dissenting opinion I authored with Judge Felici in Grzeda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, 15 March 2022).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 72881/01

  BRANCHE DE MOSCOU DE L'ARMEE DU SALUT c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  Having regard to its findings under Article 11, the Court decides to dispense with the examination of the complaints under Article 13 and Article 14 in conjunction with Articles 10 and 11 (see Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 100, ECHR 2006-XI).
• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  PRIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  The Court reiterates that since overcrowding during a public event is fraught with danger, it is not uncommon for State authorities in various countries to impose restrictions on the location, date, time, form or manner of conduct of a planned public gathering (see Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 130, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 14988/09

  Homosexuellen-Kundgebungen verboten: Russland erneut verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  It considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage the applicants may have suffered (see United Civil Aviation Trade Union and Csorba v. Hungary, no. 27585/13, § 35, 22 May 2018, and the cases cited therein; see also, mutatis mutandis, Alekseyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 14988/09 and 50 others, § 29, 27 November 2018).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  The Court reiterates in that regard that the right of peaceful assembly is one of the foundations of any democratic society, and only convincing and compelling reasons can justify an interference with that right (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, § 56, ECHR 2003-III, and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 39, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  The Court reiterates in that regard that the right of peaceful assembly is one of the foundations of any democratic society, and only convincing and compelling reasons can justify an interference with that right (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, § 56, ECHR 2003-III, and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 39, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 34202/06

  BERLADIR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 27585/13

  UNITED CIVIL AVIATION TRADE UNION AND CSORBA v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 37273/10

  SÜLEYMAN ÇELEBI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 58050/08

  SÁSKA v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 38951/13

  ABRAMYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 29026/06

  BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 28448/16

  CHIGIRINOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 39954/09

  NEPOMNYASHCHIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 48310/16

  KABLIS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
• VG der Ev.-Luth. Kirche in Bayern, 30.10.2007 - 20/27

  Pfarrdienstverhältnis, Teildienst