Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROWLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 2, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 26.10.1999 - 37900/97

  ERIKSON v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  In the case of deaths of patients in care, whether in the public or private sector, this entails an effective independent judicial system by which the cause of death can be determined and those responsible made accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002-I, § 49; Erikson v. Italy (dec.), no. 37900/97, 26 October 1999; and Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 45305/99

  POWELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  In the case of deaths of patients in care, whether in the public or private sector, this entails an effective independent judicial system by which the cause of death can be determined and those responsible made accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002-I, § 49; Erikson v. Italy (dec.), no. 37900/97, 26 October 1999; and Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  This investigation should be independent, accessible to the victim's family, carried out with reasonable promptness and expedition, and effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to a determination of whether the force used in such cases was or was not justified in the circumstances or otherwise unlawful, and should afford a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 111-115, ECHR 2001-III).

 
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  In the sphere of medical negligence, the obligation may for instance also be satisfied if the legal system affords victims a remedy in the civil courts, either alone or in conjunction with a remedy in the criminal courts, enabling any liability of the doctors concerned to be established and any appropriate civil redress, such as an order for damages and for the publication of the decision, to be obtained, together with the additional possibility of disciplinary measures (see Calvelli and Ciglio, cited above, § 51; Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 90, ECHR 2002-VIII; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004 -...).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  The Court recalls, however, that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress as appropriate (see, amongst many authorities, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  According to the Court's case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03

  The Court's case-law establishes that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", also requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see, mutatis mutandis, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, § 161, and Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 86).

• EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 63101/00

  FLOAREA POP c. ROUMANIE

  C'est généralement par rapport aux différents recours, de nature pénale, disciplinaire et civile, qui auraient été disponibles que la Cour a examiné le respect de l'obligation procédurale tirée de l'article 2 dans des affaires relatives au décès d'une personne susceptible d'avoir été causé par un défaut de surveillance ou de traitement médical adéquat alors que cette personne se trouvait sous le contrôle des autorités (Tarariyeva c. Russie, no 4353/03, §§ 90-101, 14 décembre 2006 ; voir aussi, mutatis mutandis, Dodov c. Bulgarie, no 59548/00, §§ 87-98, 7 janvier 2008, et Rowley c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 31914/03, 2 février 2005).
• EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 40957/07

  PEARSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  A Jamieson Inquest, held in relation to a death which pre-dated the entry into force of the HRA, has been found, having regard to the particular facts of certain cases, to constitute the, or one of the, effective means of satisfying the investigative requirement of Article 2 of the Convention (McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324; Douglas-Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 56413/00, 8 January 2002; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR, 7 January 2003; Rowley v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 31914/03, 22 February 2005; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 39953/07, 19 January 2010).