Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ISTRATOIU v. ROMANIA

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ISTRAÈšOIU v. ROMANIA

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43134/05

  G.N. u.a. ./. Italien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56556/10

  The Court also recalls that the positive obligations enshrined in Article 2 of the Convention, under its procedural head, require an effective independent judicial system to be set up by the authorities so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or private sector, can be determined and those responsible be held accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Eugenia Lazar, cited above, § 66-71; and G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69, 80 and 81, 1 December 2009).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56556/10

  The Court also recalls that the positive obligations enshrined in Article 2 of the Convention, under its procedural head, require an effective independent judicial system to be set up by the authorities so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or private sector, can be determined and those responsible be held accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Eugenia Lazar, cited above, § 66-71; and G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69, 80 and 81, 1 December 2009).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56556/10

  The Court also recalls that the positive obligations enshrined in Article 2 of the Convention, under its procedural head, require an effective independent judicial system to be set up by the authorities so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or private sector, can be determined and those responsible be held accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Eugenia Lazar, cited above, § 66-71; and G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69, 80 and 81, 1 December 2009).

• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 7624/18

  DEME c. ROUMANIE

  Le Gouvernement s'appuie principalement sur les affaires Codarcea c. Roumanie, no 31675/04, §§ 38-40, 2 juin 2009 ; Floarea Pop c. Roumanie, no 63101/00, §§ 15 et 16, 6 avril 2010 ; Stihi-Boos c. Roumanie (déc.), no 7823/06, § 64, 11 février 2011 ; Motocu c. Roumanie (déc.), no 49794/10, § 37, 13 janvier 2015, et Istratoiu c. Roumanie (déc.), no 56556/10, § 84, 27 janvier 2015.
• EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 80784/13

  VLASE c. ROUMANIE

  Quant à la durée de la procédure, le Gouvernement renvoie à d'autres affaires similaires dans lesquelles des procédures pénales allant de quatre à sept ans avaient été jugées conformes aux exigences de célérité imposées par l'article 2 de la Convention (Desjardins c. France (déc.), no 50533/07, 15 juin 2010, Stihi-Boos c. Roumanie (déc.) no 7823/06, § 57, 11 octobre 2011, Motocu c. Roumanie (déc.), no 49794/10, § 38, 13 janvier 2015, et Istratoiu c. Roumanie (déc.), no 56556/10, § 77, 27 janvier 2015).