Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SÁRKOZI v. HUNGARY

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
  Partly inadmissible Partly admissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  Accordingly, a person may exceptionally no longer claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention, when the national authorities have acknowledged either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Eur. Court. H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 30, para. 66).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  Moreover, it is for the State to prove that there exist available remedies which have not been utilised by those concerned (see Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, pp. 15 and 16, paras. 26 and 29, with further references; De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, para. 39).
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  1 (Art. 6-1), as long as the sentence is not definitely fixed (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 35, para. 77).

 
• EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

  RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  However, while an applicant is, as a general rule, in duty bound to exercise the different remedies before he applies to the Commission, it is open to the Commission to accept the fact that the last stage of such remedies may be reached shortly after the lodging of the application but before its decision on admissibility (cf., Eur. Court H.R., Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 38, para. 91).
• EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

  DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  Moreover, it is for the State to prove that there exist available remedies which have not been utilised by those concerned (see Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, pp. 15 and 16, paras. 26 and 29, with further references; De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, para. 39).
• EKMR, 04.07.1978 - 7742/76

  A.B. et SOCIETE A.S. c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  The Commission recalls that the Convention only governs, for each Contracting Party, facts subsequent to its entry into force with respect to that Party (cf. No. 7742/76, Dec. 4.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 146).
• EKMR, 06.10.1976 - 7211/75

  X. v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  In these circumstances, the Commission finds that the decisions taken prior to the date of entry into force of the Convention in respect of Hungary, and the proceedings relating thereto do not come within the jurisdiction of the Commission ratione temporis (cf., mutatis mutandis, No. 7211/75, Dec. 6.10.76, D.R. 7 p. 104).
• EKMR, 08.05.1978 - 7761/77

  X. c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 05.07.1995 - 21967/93

  As regards the proceedings concerning the applicant's request for a reopening of the criminal proceedings, the Commission recalls that Article 6 (Art. 6) does not apply to such proceedings given the fact that someone who applies for his case to be reopened and whose sentence has become final is not charged with a criminal offence within the meaning of the said Article (Art. 6) (cf. No. 7761/77, Dec. 8.5.78, D.R 14 p. 171).

• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

  VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  "12. The Court recalls the findings of the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") concerning the effectiveness of those remedies in the context of alleged violations of Articles 3 and 8 (see Sárközi v. Hungary, no. 21967/93, Commission's report of 6 March 1997).