Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  H.G. AND G.B. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 14+8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 24.10.1983 - 5947/72

  SILVER ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 11084/02

  In exercising the discretion thus conferred on it, the Court will have regard to what is equitable in all the circumstances of the case (Silver and Others (Article 50), 24 October 1983, Series A no. 67, para 9).
• EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76

  DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 11084/02

  We would recall that under Article 41 just satisfaction will be afforded by the Court only "if necessary" (see, inter alia, the Dudgeon judgment of 24 February 1983, Series A no. 59, p.7., par. 11).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 39392/98

  L. AND V. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 11084/02

  The Court notes that the legal situation has remained unchanged since 9 January 2003, when it gave its L. and V. v. Austria judgment (nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I).

• EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 31913/07

  E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005; C Wolfmeyer v. Austria, no. 5263/03, 26 May 2005; and R.H. v. Austria, no. 7336/03, 19 January 2006).
• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 30812/07

  TRÉVALEC c. BELGIQUE

  [3] Voir par exemple l'opinion des juges Lorenzen et Vajic dans l'arrêt Ouranio Toxo et autres c. Grèce (no 74989/01, 20 octobre 2005), l'opinion du juge Golcuklu dans l'arrêt Aktas c. Turquie (no 24351/94, 24 avril 2003), l'opinion de la juge Vajic, à laquelle se sont ralliés les juges Botoucharova et Kovler, dans l'arrêt S.L. c. Autriche (no 45330/99, 9 janvier 2003), l'opinion des juges Boutocharova et Hajiyev dans l'arrêt H.G. et G.B. c. Autriche (nos 11084/02 et 13306/02, 2 juin 2005) et l'opinion du juge Pavlovschi dans les arrêts Holomiov c. Moldova (no 30649/05, 7 novembre 2006) et Hutten-Czapska c. Pologne ([GC], no 35104/07, 22 février 2005).
• EGMR - 48779/07

  [ENG]

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).

 
• EGMR - 48777/07

  [ENG]

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
• EGMR - 38357/07

  [ENG]

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courtsâ?² and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Article 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I and H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005.).
• EGMR - 48098/07

  [ENG]

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courtsâ?² and authoritiesâ?² refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
• EGMR - 26271/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I and H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005.).