Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B.A.C. c. GRÈCE

  Violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8 - Obligations positives;Article 8-1 - Respect de la vie privée);Violation de l'article 13+8 - Droit à un recours effectif (Article 13 - Recours effectif) (Article 8-1 - Respect ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B.A.C. v. GREECE - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  B.A.C. c. GRÈCE

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  [FRE]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2018, 557

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 51431/99

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 11981/15

  Εξάλλ&omikron;υ, τ&omikron; άρθρ&omikron; 8 της ΣÏ�µβασης δεν φθάνει µÎ­χρι τ&omikron;υ σηµεί&omikron;υ να εγγυάται στ&omikron;ν ενδιαφερόµεν&omikron; τ&omikron; δικαίωµα ενός ιδιαίτερ&omikron;υ τÏ�π&omikron;υ τίτλ&omikron;υ παραµ&omikron;νής (µόνιµ&omikron;υ, πρ&omikron;σωριν&omikron;Ï� ή άλλ&omikron;υ), υπό την πρ&omikron;Ï‹πόθεση ότι η πρ&omikron;τεινόµενη από τις αρχές λÏ�ση τ&omikron;υ επιτρέπει να ασκεί ανεµπόδιστα τα δικαιώµατά τ&omikron;υ στ&omikron;ν σεβασµό της ιδιωτικής και της &omikron;ικ&omikron;γενειακής ζωής (Aristimuño Mendizabal κατά Γαλλίας, αριθ. 51431/99, §§ 65-66, 17 Ιαν&omikron;υαρί&omikron;υ 2006).
• EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 2237/08

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 11981/15

  &Omikron; πρ&omikron;σφεÏ�γων θεωρεί ότι υπάρχ&omikron;υν &omikron;µ&omikron;ιότητες µεταξÏ� της παρ&omikron;Ï�σας υπόθεσης και της υπόθεσης R.U. κατά Ελλάδας (αριθ. 2237/08, 7 Ι&omikron;υνί&omikron;υ 2011) και, στηριζόµεν&omikron;ς στην ν&omikron;µ&omikron;λ&omikron;γία τ&omikron;υ Δικαστηρί&omikron;υ, υπενθυµίζει ότι η Ελλάδα έχει καταδικαστεί π&omikron;λλές φ&omikron;ρές λόγω των ελλείψεων τ&omikron;υ συστήµατ&omikron;ς ασÏ�λ&omikron;υ της.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.07.2020 - 25402/14

  PORMES v. THE NETHERLANDS

  On the other hand, positive obligations arise for States in cases concerning, inter alia, the denial of a residence permit to individuals already present in the territory of the respondent State (see, for example, Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, 3 October 2014; B.A.C. v. Greece, no. 11981/15, 13 October 2016; Abuhmaid v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13, 12 January 2017; Ejimson v. Germany, no. 58681/12, 1 March 2018; and Hoti v. Croatia, no. 63311/14, 26 April 2018).
• EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 63311/14

  HOTI v. CROATIA

  In the Court's case-law, such cases, each of course within its particular factual circumstances, were found to involve an allegation of a failure on the part of the respondent State to comply with a positive obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to ensure an effective enjoyment of an applicant's private and/or family life (see Kurić and Others, cited above, §§ 357-58; Jeunesse, cited above, § 105; B.A.C. v. Greece, no. 11981/15, § 36, 13 October 2016; and Abuhmaid v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13, §§ 116-18, 12 January 2017).
• EGMR, 17.07.2025 - 5212/23

  SILES CABRERA v. SPAIN

  Even though Article 8 did not guarantee a right to a particular type of residence permit, the solution proposed by the authorities should nonetheless allow the individual to exercise his rights to private and family life without obstacles (he referred to B.A.C. v. Greece, no. 11981/15, § 35, 13 October 2016).

• EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 34298/18

  A.J. v. GREECE

  In view of its conclusion that it is not justified to continue the examination of the complaint concerning the applicant's return (see paragraph 57 above), and in the absence of any enduring uncertainty (compare B.A.C. v. Greece, no. 11981/15, § 40, 13 October 2016) the Court concludes that there is no need to examine separately the applicant's complaint under Article 8, taken alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13

  ABUHMAID v. UKRAINE

  In the case of B.A.C. v. Greece (no. 11981/15, § 46, 13 October 2016, not yet final) the Court found that Article 8 of the Convention had been breached on account of the State's failure to discharge its positive obligation.
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 24421/20

  SAHITI c. BELGIQUE

  Rn. 67 Il n'est pas non plus contesté par le Gouvernement que ces éléments plaçaient le requérant dans une situation de précarité et de vulnérabilité certaines et que, dans ces circonstances, l'incertitude éprouvée par le requérant quant à son statut a pris une dimension toute particulière par rapport à celle d'un étranger qui attend la fin, dans des délais raisonnables, de la procédure le concernant (dans le même sens, mutatis mutandis, B.A.C. c. Grèce, no 11981/15, § 39, 13 octobre 2016).
• EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 42321/15

  SUDITA KEITA v. HUNGARY

  Moreover, neither Article 8 nor any other provision of the Convention can be construed as guaranteeing, as such, the right to the granting of a particular type of residence permit, provided that a solution offered by the authorities allows the individual concerned to exercise without obstacles his or her right to respect for private and/or family life (see Aristimuño Mendizabal v. France, no. 51431/99, § 66, 17 January 2006, and B.A.C. v. Greece [no. 11981/15, § 35, 13 October 2016]).
• EGMR - 14354/21 (anhängig)

  O.M. c. GRÈCE

  Compte tenu de la vulnérabilité du requérant et de sa détention entre le 26 janvier 2020 et le 10 février 2021, y a-t-il eu ingérence dans le droit du requérant au respect de sa vie privée, au sens de l'article 8 § 1 de la Convention, en raison de la durée alléguée de traitement de sa demande de protection internationale (M.S.S. c. Belgique et Grèce [GC], no 30696/09, § 262, 21 janvier 2011 et B.A.C. c. Grèce, no 11981/15, §§ 37, 13 octobre 2016) ? Dans l'affirmative, l'ingérence était-elle conforme aux exigences de l'article 8 § 2 de la Convention ?.