Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LASKA AND LIKA v. ALBANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04, 17605/04
• EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 12315/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02

  Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  This also reflects the principles of international law whereby a State responsible for a wrongful act is under an obligation to make restitution, consisting in restoring the situation which existed before the wrongful act was committed (Article 35 of the Draft Articles of the International Law Commission on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts - see paragraph 35 above, and, mutatis mutandis, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  Even if the primary purpose of Article 6, as far as criminal proceedings are concerned, is to ensure a fair trial by a "tribunal" competent to determine "any criminal charge", it does not follow that the Article has no application to pre-trial proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275).
• EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 52868/99

  KWIATKOWSKA contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  It does not transpire from the case file that the applicants waived of their own free will, either expressly or tacitly, the entitlement to legal assistance at the time of the identification parade (see, by contrast, Kwiatkowska v. Italy (dec.), no. 52868/99, 30 November 2000).

• EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 3932/02

  BATSANINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  The principle of equality of arms requires "a fair balance between the parties", each party must be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 22, 26 May 2009).
• EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 30997/02

  POLUFAKIN AND CHERNYSHEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  The Court cannot speculate as to what the outcome of the criminal proceedings against the applicant might have been if the violation of the Convention had not occurred (see Polufakin and Chernyshev v. Russia, no. 30997/02, § 216, 25 September 2008).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  The Court reiterates that the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies referred to in Article 35 of the Convention obliges those seeking to bring their case against the State before the Court to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 48, Series A no. 24).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  Were the Government's submission to be interpreted to the effect that the applicants lacked "victim" status, the Court observes that a decision or measure favourable to an applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for the breach of the Convention (see, for example, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq; and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  An applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail (see Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI).
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  The complaints should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law and, further, that any procedural means that might prevent a breach of the Convention should have been used (see Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200).
• EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 32567/06

  WILLIAMS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 12315/04

  The Court reiterates that an application for retrial or similar extraordinary remedies cannot, as a general rule, be taken into account for the purposes of applying Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see also, Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32567/06, 17 February 2009).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen