Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TABOR v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 12825/02
• EGMR, 24.01.2006 - 12825/02
• EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 12825/02

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.12.2001 - 29692/96

  R.D. v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02

  In consequence, the State is not obliged to ensure legal assistance in every civil case (R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001).

  In discharging that obligation, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001).

• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02

  In this context, the means by which a State ensured effective access to civil courts fell within its margin of appreciation (Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, § 26).

  This is particularly so of the right of access to court in view of the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial (see Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, § 24).

• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02

  It is central to the concept of a fair trial, in civil as in criminal proceedings, that a litigant is not denied the opportunity to present his or her case effectively before the court (ibid.; see also among other examples Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 59, ECHR 2005-...).

• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02

  In addition, the compatibility of the limitations permitted under domestic law with the right of access to a court set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention depends on the special features of the proceedings in issue, and it is necessary to take into account the whole of the trial conducted according to the rules of the domestic legal system and the role played in that trial by the highest court, since the conditions of admissibility of an appeal on points of law may be more rigorous than those for an ordinary appeal (Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 15, § 26).
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46800/99

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02

  The Court points out at the outset that there is no obligation under the Convention to make legal aid available for disputes (contestations) in civil proceedings, as there is a clear distinction between the wording of Article 6 § 3 (c), which guarantees the right to free legal assistance on certain conditions in criminal proceedings, and of Article 6 § 1, which makes no reference to legal assistance (Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 20, ECHR 2002-II).
• RG, 19.01.1897 - 9/97

  1. Müssen diejenigen richterlichen Mitglieder des Schwurgerichtes, vor denen die …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 12825/02

  As they did not fall into either of the two principal categories listed in Article 394, the only possible conclusion was that no appeal was available against them (II CZ 9/97, 21 February 1997, unpublished; I CZ 27/97, 4 April 1997, OSNC 1997, No. 9, item 120; I CZ 14/97, 8 April 1997, OSN 1997 No. 9, item 120).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.09.2023 - C-582/21

  Profi Credit Polska (Réouverture de la procédure terminée par une décision …

  {FN:50} Entscheidung des polnischen Obersten Gerichts I PZ 5/07 vom 17. April 2007 sowie, nach meinem Verständnis und unter dem Vorbehalt der Prüfung durch das vorlegende Gericht, EGMR, 27. Juni 2006, Tabor/Polen (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD001282502).
• EGMR, 22.03.2007 - 8932/05

  SIALKOWSKA v. POLAND

  In this respect, I consider that the situation cannot be compared to that in the case of Tabor v. Poland (no. 12825/02, judgment of 27 June 2006), where the Court did find a violation, in a case where the national court dealt with the applicant's request for legal aid in a way which left him without any realistic opportunity of seeking legal assistance of his choice in lodging a cassation appeal.
• EGMR, 13.03.2007 - 77765/01

  LASKOWSKA v. POLAND

  The Court recalls that there is a clear distinction between the wording of Article 6 § 3 (c), which guarantees the right to free legal assistance on certain conditions in criminal proceedings, and of Article 6 § 1, which makes no reference to legal assistance (Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 20, ECHR 2002-II; Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, § 39, 27 June 2006).

• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 28095/08

  [ENG]

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that there is no obligation under the Convention to make legal aid available for disputes (contestations) in civil proceedings, as there is a clear distinction between the wording of Article 6 § 3 (c), which guarantees the right to free legal assistance under certain conditions in criminal proceedings, and of Article 6 § 1, which makes no reference to legal assistance (see Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 20, ECHR 2002-II, and Tabor v. Poland, no 12825/02, § 39, 27 June 2006).
• EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 68221/12

  N. v. POLAND

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of the right of access to court (see, for example, Bobrowski v. Poland, no. 64916/01, 17 June 2008, Laskowska v. Poland, no. 77765/01, 13 March 2007 and Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, 27 June 2006).
• EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 30358/04

  [FRE]

  However, the Court must satisfy itself that the method chosen by the domestic authorities in a particular case is compatible with the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, in criminal law proceedings, R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001; Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, §§ 58 and 59 ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, §§ 33 and 34, 19 May 2009 and, in civil law proceedings, Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, §§ 39-43, 27 June 2006).
• EGMR, 03.04.2007 - 43788/05

  KARUNA v. UKRAINE

  The Court's task is only to review the method chosen by the domestic authorities and its compatibility with the Convention (see Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, § 40, 27 June 2006).
• EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 17325/04

  [ENG]

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the granting of legal aid and the lodging of cassation appeals are stated in the Court's judgment in Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, §§ 16-23, 27 June 2006.
• EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 17157/04

  [ENG]

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the granting of legal aid and the lodging of cassation appeals are stated in the Court's judgment in Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, §§ 16-23, 27 June 2006.
• EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 40048/07

  [ENG]

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning granting legal aid and lodging of cassation appeals are stated in the Court's judgment of Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, §§ 16-23, 27 June 2006.
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 13526/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 31419/07

  KIMMEL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 14883/04

  NOWINSKI v. POLAND