Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 13886/02, 44208/02, 27865/02, 24660/03, 1194/04, 14419/03, 13270/02, 16328/03, 26602/02, 3129/04, 2040/04, 14260/03, 27307/04, 6924/03, 35164/03, 46881/06, 10541/03, 34188/03, 6906/03, 37812/04, 31731/03, 40233/03, 31391/03, 39151/04, 34151/03, 17010/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 13886/02, 44208/02, 27865/02, 24660/03, 1194/04, 14419/03, 13270/02, 16328/03, 26602/02, 3129/04, 2040/04, 14260/03, 27307/04, 6924/03, 35164/03, 46881/06, 10541/03, 34188/03, 6906/03, 37812/04, 31731/03, 40233/03, 31391/03, 39151/04, 34151/03, 17010/04 (https://dejure.org/2016,3844)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.03.2016 - 13886/02, 44208/02, 27865/02, 24660/03, 1194/04, 14419/03, 13270/02, 16328/03, 26602/02, 3129/04, 2040/04, 14260/03, 27307/04, 6924/03, 35164/03, 46881/06, 10541/03, 34188/03, 6906/03, 37812/04, 31731/03, 40233/03, 31391/03, 39151/04, 34151/03, 17010/04 (https://dejure.org/2016,3844)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. März 2016 - 13886/02, 44208/02, 27865/02, 24660/03, 1194/04, 14419/03, 13270/02, 16328/03, 26602/02, 3129/04, 2040/04, 14260/03, 27307/04, 6924/03, 35164/03, 46881/06, 10541/03, 34188/03, 6906/03, 37812/04, 31731/03, 40233/03, 31391/03, 39151/04, 34151/03, 17010/04 (https://dejure.org/2016,3844)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,3844) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS AND 54 OTHER CASES AGAINST \
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ATANASOVIC ET AUTRES ET 54 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE « L'EX-RÉPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACEDOINE »
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
- EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 13886/02, 44208/02, 27865/02, 24660/03, 1194/04, 14419/03, 13270/02, 16328/03, 26602/02, 3129/04, 2040/04, 14260/03, 27307/04, 6924/03, 35164/03, 46881/06, 10541/03, 34188/03, 6906/03, 37812/04, 31731/03, 40233/03, 31391/03, 39151/04, 34151/03, 17010/04
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,52006) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
- EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 13886/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
The Court recalls that Article 13 of the Convention guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged violation of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86
FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
As established in the Court's case-law, for a claim of violation of Article 14 to succeed, it has therefore to be established, inter alia, that the situation of the alleged victim can be considered similar to that of persons who have been better treated (see, mutatis mutandis, Fredin v. Sweden (no. 1), judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 19, § 60). - EGMR, 23.10.1990 - 11581/85
DARBY v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
Such a difference in treatment is discriminatory in the absence of an "objective and reasonable justification", that is, if it is not justified by a "legitimate aim" and if there is no "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see Hoffmann v. Austria, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 255-C, § 31; Darby v. Sweden, judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 187, § 31).
- EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12875/87
HOFFMANN c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
Such a difference in treatment is discriminatory in the absence of an "objective and reasonable justification", that is, if it is not justified by a "legitimate aim" and if there is no "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see Hoffmann v. Austria, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 255-C, § 31; Darby v. Sweden, judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 187, § 31). - EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76
FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
The Court reiterates that in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 10 April 1997 (see, among other authorities, Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII). - EGMR, 30.10.1998 - 28616/95
STYRANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 13886/02
The Court reiterates that in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 10 April 1997 (see, among other authorities, Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII).