Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05, 24618/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,36694
EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05, 24618/05 (https://dejure.org/2015,36694)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.12.2015 - 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05, 24618/05 (https://dejure.org/2015,36694)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Dezember 2015 - 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05, 24618/05 (https://dejure.org/2015,36694)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,36694) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KOVALENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - ...

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Zitiert selbst (32)

  • EGMR - 1407/05

    IVANOV AND PETRUSHIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03
    (Applications nos. 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05 and 24618/05).

    The case originated in seven applications (nos. 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05 and 24618/05) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by eight Russian nationals ("the applicants").

    1407/05.

    1407/05.

  • BGH, 22.12.2011 - AK 22/11

    Fortdauer der Untersuchungshaft über sechs Monate hinaus (dringender Tatverdacht; …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03
    23/11/2004.

    23/11/2004.

  • VGH der UEK, 29.03.2005 - 29/01
    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03
    29/01/1946.

    29/01/1946.

  • EGMR, 10.03.2017 - 52854/99

    RYABYKH AND 112 OTHER CASES AGAINST RUSSIA

    36299/03+.

    36299/03.

  • OVG Nordrhein-Westfalen, 17.12.2008 - 10 A 3002/07

    Erweiterung einer Mobilfunk-Basisstation auf dem Flachdach eines viergeschossigen …

    Rn. 46 Vgl. zur Bestimmtheit der Baugenehmigung OVG NRW, Beschluss vom 9. Juni 2006 - 10 B 2071/05 - Urteil vom 10. Dezember 1998 - 10 A 4248/92 -, BRS 58 Nr. 216; Boeddinghaus / Hahn / Schulte, Bauordnung NRW, Stand Mai 2007, § 75 Rdnr. 137-142 m.w.N.
  • EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 2982/05

    [ENG]

    Having regard to the principles developed in its case-law on the determination of just satisfaction in similar cases (see Kovalenko and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 et al., §§ 41-43, 8 December 2015), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award Ms Shurygina and Ms Borozdina a lump sum of EUR 5, 000 each to cover all heads of damage.
  • EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 34248/05

    [ENG]

    Having regard to the principles developed in its case-law on the determination of compensation in similar cases (see, most recently, Kovalenko and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 36299/03, 8 December 2015), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award Mr Kulnev a lump sum of EUR 5, 000 in respect of all heads of damage.
  • EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 41337/04

    [ENG]

    The Court observes that it has already found numerous violations of the Convention on account of the quashing of final judgments by way of supervisory review under the Code of Civil Procedure, as in force at the material time (see, among many other authorities, Kot, cited above, § 29; Kovalenko and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05 and 24618/05, 8 December 2015; and Zelenkevich and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 14805/02, 20 June 2013).
  • EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 20707/06

    ISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    On the other hand, the amount of compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proposed by the Government differs substantially from the amounts of compensation awarded to the applicants by the Court in virtually identical cases (see Gruzda v. Russia [Committee], no. 63833/09, § 23, 5 April 2016, and Kovalenko and Others, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, §§ 42-43, 8 December 2015).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

    FOMIN AND SIVAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Some of those violations were found in similar circumstances and similarly concerned the quashing of final domestic judgments making awards (see, among many other authorities, Kovalenko and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, 8 December 2015, and Zelenkevich and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 14805/02, 20 June 2013).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 42968/06

    SHOROKHOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Some of those violations were found in similar circumstances and similarly concerned the quashing of final domestic judgments making awards (see, among many other authorities, Kovalenko and Others, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, 8 December 2015; Zelenkevich and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 14805/02, 20 June 2013; and, on account of the lack of jurisdiction of the court, Miroshnikov and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. 20750/04 and 2 others, § 15, 27 September 2016).
  • EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 17229/06

    SADKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    On the other hand, the amount of compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proposed by the Government differs substantially from the amounts of compensation awarded to the applicants by the Court in virtually identical cases (see Gruzda v. Russia [Committee], no. 63833/09, § 23, 5 April 2016, and Kovalenko and Others, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, §§ 42-43, 8 December 2015).
  • EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 4629/07

    [ENG]

    The Court reiterates its constant approach that in the absence of a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings a party's disagreement with the assessment made by the first-instance and appeal courts is not a circumstance of a substantial and compelling character warranting the quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment and re-opening of the proceedings on the applicant's claim (see Kovalenko and others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05 and 24618/05, § 16, 8 December 2015).
  • EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 18451/04

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 6131/07

    KOROBEYNIKOV v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht