Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 16400/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,62092
EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 16400/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,62092)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.11.2008 - 16400/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,62092)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. November 2008 - 16400/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,62092)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,62092) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (42)Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 24.06.2004 - 56079/00

    DI SANTE contre l'ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 16400/06
    The Court therefore considers that the present situation should be distinguished from the cases where an effective remedy appeared as a result of a development in the jurisprudence of domestic courts (see Broca and Texier-Micault v. France, nos. 27928/02 and 31694/02, § 20, 21 October 2003, and Di Sante v. Italy (dec.), no. 56079/00, 24 June 2004).
  • EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 463/03

    KORENJAK v. SLOVENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 16400/06
    The Court further reiterates that the mere fact that an applicant had lodged his or her application before the implementation of the 2006 Act does not absolve him or her from exhausting the remedies available under the 2006 Act (see Korenjak v. Slovenia ((dec.) no. 463/03, §§ 63-61, 15 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 24342/04

    ZUNIC v. SLOVENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 16400/06
    It notes that it has found in the previous cases against Slovenia that the applicants were required to make use of the acceleratory remedies if the proceedings were pending before the first or second-instance court (see Korenjak, cited above), and that they were also required to use the compensatory remedy provided that, after exhausting the acceleratory remedies, they had reasonably prompt access to it (Žunic v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 43-55, 18 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05

    [ENG]

    For relevant domestic law see Nezirovic v. Slovenia ((dec.) no. 16400/06, 25 November 2008).

    Following the Court's findings in the cases Grzincic v. Slovenia (no. 26867/02, § 110, 3 May 2007) and Nezirovic v. Slovenia (no. 16400/06, (dec.), 18 November 2008 §§ 27-42) the complaints under Articles 6 and 13 must be declared inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention, respectively.

  • EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 17596/06

    ZABOVNIK v. SLOVENIA

    For relevant domestic law see Nezirovic v. Slovenia ((dec.) no. 16400/06, 25 November 2008).

    However, considering that after the remittal by the Supreme Court, the proceedings on first-instance lasted for only two months (see paragraphs 9-11 above) the question that arises in the present case is whether the applicants had a real opportunity to properly exhaust acceleratory remedies in order to be able to claim compensation for the violation of the reasonable time requirement after the final resolution of the proceedings (see Nezirovic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 16400/06, § 41, 25 November 2008).

  • EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 3272/07

    MARKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

    For relevant domestic law see the judgment Maksimovic v. Slovenia, no. 28662/05, 22 June 2010, and Nezirovic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 16400/06 25 November 2008.

    As regards the applicants Mr Zoran Veber and Mr Dragan Simovic the Court notes that in their case the civil proceedings terminated on 11 May 2007 and they had about five months at their disposal to make at least a constructive attempt to exhaust the new remedies available under the 2006 Act (see Nezirovic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 16400/06, §§ 27- 41, 25 November 2008).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht