Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VÖRDUR ÓLAFSSON CONTRE L'ISLANDE

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VÖRDUR ÓLAFSSON AGAINST ICELAND

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 20161/06

Wird zitiert von ...

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 77400/14

  AYOUB c. FRANCE

  La Cour rappelle ensuite que la protection des opinions et de la liberté de les exprimer au sens de l'article 10 de la Convention constitue l'un des objectifs de la liberté de réunion et d'association consacrée par l'article 11, de sorte que l'article 11 s'envisage à la lumière de l'article 10 (Young, James et Webster c. Royaume-Uni, 13 août 1981, § 57, série A no 44, Parti nationaliste basque - Organisation régionale d'Iparralde c. France, no 71251/01, § 33, CEDH 2007-II, Vörður Ólafsson c. Islande, no 20161/06, § 46, CEDH 2010 ).

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÓLAFSSON v. ICELAND

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 11, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Admissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20161/06
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 20161/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

  Chassagnou u.a. ./. Frankreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06

  Nor were the circumstances in the applicant's case comparable to those in Chassagnou and Others v. France ([GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 11.01.2006 - 52562/99

  Vereinbarkeit von closed-shop-Vereinbarungen mit Art. 11 Abs. 1 EMRK?

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06

  In the Government's opinion, there was a fundamental difference between the situation at issue in the present case and that in previous judgments by the Court concerning the negative aspects of the freedom of association, notably Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom (13 August 1981, Series A no. 44), Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (30 June 1993, Series A no. 264) and Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark ([GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99 ECHR 2006-).
• EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06

  In the Government's opinion, there was a fundamental difference between the situation at issue in the present case and that in previous judgments by the Court concerning the negative aspects of the freedom of association, notably Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom (13 August 1981, Series A no. 44), Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (30 June 1993, Series A no. 264) and Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark ([GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99 ECHR 2006-).
• EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90

  Sigurdur A. Sigurjónsson ./. Island

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06

  In the Government's opinion, there was a fundamental difference between the situation at issue in the present case and that in previous judgments by the Court concerning the negative aspects of the freedom of association, notably Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom (13 August 1981, Series A no. 44), Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (30 June 1993, Series A no. 264) and Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark ([GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99 ECHR 2006-).
• EGMR, 13.02.2007 - 75252/01

  Evaldsson u.a. ./. Schweden

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20161/06

  Such a small sum could not constitute a financial burden for him and distinguished the present case from that of Evaldsson and Others v. Sweden, no. 75252/01, 13 February 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen