Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 21417/04 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHIRYAYEVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (52) Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 21417/04
The Court reiterates that, where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs of next kin may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 63973/00
ANDROSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 21417/04
Furthermore, the Court observes that a distinction must be drawn between, on the one hand, declarations made in the context of strictly confidential friendly-settlement proceedings (Article 38 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court) and, on the other hand, unilateral declarations made by a respondent Government in public and adversarial proceedings before the Court (see Androsov v. Russia, no. 63973/00, § 45, 6 October 2005). - EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02
GOROKHOV AND RUSYAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 21417/04
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to those in the present case (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; Androsov, cited above; and Gorokhov and Rusyayev v. Russia, no. 38305/02, 17 March 2005).
- EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 58263/00
TIMOFEYEV AND 234 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
21417/04.21417/04.
- EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 8549/06
[ENG]
In fact, the Court has previously accepted that the late applicants' close relatives could maintain applications with complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention (see Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, § 1, 12 July 2001, with further references; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, § 8, 13 July 2006, concerning the non-enforcement of the domestic judgment; see also Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005, in the context of the length of proceedings). - EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 30672/03
SOBELIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Furthermore, in two Russian cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments in the applicant's favour, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, § 8, 13 July 2006; see also Shvedov v. Russia, no. 69306/01, 20 October 2005, where the Court implicitly recognised locus standi of the applicant's son).
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 2982/05
[ENG]
The Court has previously accepted that close relatives of applicants who have died can maintain applications that include complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention (see Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, § 8, 13 July 2006 (concerning the non-enforcement of domestic judgments); and Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005 (in the context of the length of proceedings); and contrast with Gorodnichev v. Russia (dec.), no. 52058/99, 24 May 2007; and, in so far as relevant, Stankevich v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 48814/07, 26 May 2009). - EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 79757/12
ANANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Furthermore, in several Russian cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments in the applicant's favour, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see, among many others, Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, § 8, 13 July 2006). - EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 3380/10
TYUTINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Furthermore, in some cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments and length of proceedings, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, §§ 8-9, 13 July 2006 concerning the non-enforcement, and Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005, in the context of the length of proceedings). - EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 10067/04
[ENG]
The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, §§ 8-9, 13 July 2006; and Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005). - EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 4465/09
TEREKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, §§ 8-9, 13 July 2006; and Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005). - EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 9117/04
NOSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Furthermore, in some cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, §§ 8-9, 13 July 2006; Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et al., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007; and Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 et al., §§ 36-42, 29 July 2010). - EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 5855/09
PUZRINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court considers that the applicant's sister has a legitimate interest in obtaining a finding of a breach of her brother's right related to the inadequate conditions of detention during transport (see Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 and 86 others, §§ 36-42, 29 July 2010; Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 and 11 others, §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007; Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, §§ 8-9, 13 July 2006; Ressegatti v. Switzerland, no. 17671/02, §§ 23-25, 13 July 2006; and Marie-Louise Loyen and Bruneel v. France, no. 55929/00, §§ 29-30, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 8265/04
RUBIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 18892/04
KRASNOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 53664/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 03.05.2018 - 31732/08
RAMIKHANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 39099/05
KHAZIYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 20857/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 3585/08
KOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 41849/04
BAZHENOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 38766/07
SUVOROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 25856/07
KOVAL v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 28309/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 21578/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 19463/04
KOLKHIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 53678/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 53637/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 18.12.2025 - 17431/23
TSOUTSIS AND ELEFTHERAKIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 13.03.2025 - 34894/22
DUMORTIER v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 55200/22
SUBOTIN v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 23.03.2023 - 48936/17
JANJIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 58226/21
PAVLOV v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2022 - 36149/20
ARSIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2022 - 58108/21
LAZIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 10785/20
NESTOROVSKI STOJAKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 31602/21
LUKIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 51204/20
LAZIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 75330/17
RADOJICIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 23224/17
CUTOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 30.04.2020 - 51145/09
STEKLYANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 45340/09
PANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 43028/09
KOLOBUTINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 36325/05
BEBUTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 23558/06
KOLTAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 18853/06
SHVAYDAK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 47687/07
GORANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 45236/04
ZAVYALOV v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
- EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 37865/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 7120/03
LUNINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 38112/04
PETR KOROLEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.05.2024 - 49571/22
DUBAJIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 46889/07
POGORELOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 13202/08
SHCHEPIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 18106/12
VASILOPOULOS c. GRÈCE
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".