Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,57520
EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,57520)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.03.2005 - 38305/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,57520)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. März 2005 - 38305/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,57520)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,57520) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GOROKHOV AND RUSYAYEV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Partly inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (43)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

    RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02
    The Court reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Burdov v. Russia, cited above, § 40; Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 84, § 59).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02
    The limit of tolerance as regards the delay in honouring a judgment debt will depend of different factors, such as the complexity of the enforcement proceedings, the applicant's own behaviour and that of the competent authorities, the amount and the nature of court award (see, by analogy, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, see also Grishchenko mentioned above).
  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

    IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02
    However, the delay may not be such as to impair the essence of the "right to a court" protected by this provision (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 75907/01

    GRISHCHENKO v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 38305/02
    The Court accepts that not every delay in the execution of a judgment constitutes a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among recent authorities, Grishchenko v. Russia, (dec.), 8 July 2004, no. 75907/01).
  • EGMR, 25.03.2008 - 11549/02

    FALIMONOV v. RUSSIA

    It follows that the domestic authorities should have treated the applicant's case with special diligence (compare Gorokhov and Rusyayev v. Russia, no. 38305/02, § 34, 17 March 2005).

    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, § 23 et seq., 29 September 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, § 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Gorokhov and Rusyayev v. Russia, no. 38305/02, § 30 et seq., 17 March 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).

  • EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

    RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

    The Court observes that the reasonableness of the delay in the enforcement proceedings will depend on different factors, such as the complexity of the enforcement proceedings, the applicant's own behaviour and that of the competent authorities, the amount and the nature of court award (see, by analogy, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; see also Grishchenko v. Russia, (dec.), no. 75907/01, 8 July 2004; and Gorokhov and Rusyayev v. Russia, no. 38305/02, 17 March 2005, § 31).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 21417/04

    SHIRYAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to those in the present case (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; Androsov, cited above; and Gorokhov and Rusyayev v. Russia, no. 38305/02, 17 March 2005).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht