Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GORDIYENKO v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Gordiyenko v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim's conduct (see, among many other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim's conduct (see, among many other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  An obligation to investigate "is not an obligation of result, but of means": not every investigation should necessarily be successful or come to a conclusion which coincides with the claimant's account of events; however, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III).

• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  An obligation to investigate "is not an obligation of result, but of means": not every investigation should necessarily be successful or come to a conclusion which coincides with the claimant's account of events; however, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  Allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see, mutatis mutandis, Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 30, Series A no. 269).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  Consideration has been given to the starting of investigations, delays in taking statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV), and the length of time taken to complete the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
• EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 7188/03

  CHEMBER v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  In these circumstances, the Court considers that the material in the case file does not provide an evidential basis sufficient to enable the Court to establish "beyond reasonable doubt" that the applicant was subjected to the ill-treatment alleged (see, for similar reasoning, Maksimov v. Russia, no. 43233/02, §§ 97-99, 18 March 2010, and, by contrast, Chember v. Russia, no. 7188/03, §§ 43-57, 3 July 2008).
• EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 43233/02

  MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  In these circumstances, the Court considers that the material in the case file does not provide an evidential basis sufficient to enable the Court to establish "beyond reasonable doubt" that the applicant was subjected to the ill-treatment alleged (see, for similar reasoning, Maksimov v. Russia, no. 43233/02, §§ 97-99, 18 March 2010, and, by contrast, Chember v. Russia, no. 7188/03, §§ 43-57, 3 July 2008).
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 24885/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  It considers, therefore, that such an appeal in the particular circumstances of the present case would have been devoid of any purpose (see, for example, Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, § 151, 17 January 2008, and Vanfuli v. Russia, no. 24885/05, §§ 72-75, 3 November 2011).
• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  KHATSIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 21462/06

  It considers, therefore, that such an appeal in the particular circumstances of the present case would have been devoid of any purpose (see, for example, Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, § 151, 17 January 2008, and Vanfuli v. Russia, no. 24885/05, §§ 72-75, 3 November 2011).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  MANSUROV v. RUSSIA

  It considers, therefore, that such an appeal in the particular circumstances of the present case would have been devoid of any purpose (see, for example, Vanfuli v. Russia, no. 24885/05, §§ 72-75, 3 November 2011, and Gordiyenko v. Russia, no. 21462/06, § 58, 6 March 2014).
• EGMR, 05.10.2021 - 5513/13

  T. v. RUSSIA

  In these particular circumstances, the Court is not convinced that any further appeals to a court would have been effective as devoid of any purpose (see, for example, Vanfuli v. Russia, no. 24885/05, §§ 72-75, 3 November 2011, and Gordiyenko v. Russia, no. 21462/06, § 58, 6 March 2014).